longislandcuse
Living Legend
- Joined
- Sep 1, 2011
- Messages
- 36,004
- Like
- 43,302
CBB needs to move to 6 fouls for Officiating incompetence. You can't have players fouling out due to phantom fouls in games like this.
CBB needs to move to 6 fouls for Officiating incompetence. You can't have players fouling out due to phantom fouls in games like this.
but what about the incompetence the other way - the many clear fouls throughout a game that are missed/ignored?CBB needs to move to 6 fouls for Officiating incompetence. You can't have players fouling out due to phantom fouls in games like this.
If Cincinnati gets a 15 seed that can score I am picking against them first round.
They are not a good offense team. Those type of teams lose early in the NCAAT.
FGCU is a very high scoring team who will be a 15/16 seed.If Cincinnati gets a 15 seed that can score I am picking against them first round.
They are not a good offense team. Those type of teams lose early in the NCAAT.
CBS has Houston a 6 seed.Upon up 3 over Houston with about 11 mins to go. It would be nice if UConn could improve from 107 in the RPI to a top 100 win.
(this one is for bpo57 )and a really close loss to unc
UConn up 5 over Houston with about 12 mins to go. It would be nice if UConn could improve from 107 in the RPI to a top 100 win for us.
No way. Go houston.
CBS has Houston a 6 seed.
They are decent in RPI at 19, but are 88 in SOS and 242 in OOC SOS. They've lost to #158 Tulane and #242 Drexel. They have 6 wins vs. the top 65. OOC they beat Arkansas and PC. They beat Cincy and Wichita.
Looking at their resume, other than the extra top 10 win, ours is stronger. If they lost today and in the 1st round of the AAC Tournament, could they be on the cut line?
This game is unwatchable. I've seen high school field hockey games with less whistles. UConn will lose by 10-15 anyway.No way. Go houston.
Yup. If not, just plug the numbers into a computer and the field falls out.I agree with you. As you have acknowledged, I believe the eye test should be one element of the process and would be disappointed if they don't use it. They can deny it but we know it's a factor. It has to be. I can just imagine a committee member being asked about XYZ University. "Uh I don't know, I've never seen them play... but they have an RPI of 44." Thx pal.
I put together some stats to make everything easier to find in one spot. Nothing you won't find anywhere else, just easier to read and formulate IMO. I took the last 10 in and the first 8 out based on the Bracket Matrix most current update.
link------
I put together some stats to make everything easier to find in one spot. Nothing you won't find anywhere else, just easier to read and formulate IMO. I took the last 10 in and the first 8 out based on the Bracket Matrix most current update.
...2018 NCAA Bubble Stats TCW8848...
Actual link to doc
I have one little quibble...I think I'll throw up my own bracket predictions on the doc before Selection Sunday, see how I do! Link above.
I think I'll throw up my own bracket predictions on the doc before Selection Sunday, see how I do! Link above.
I have one little quibble...
My quibble was not with what you posted (or course you are allowed to post that), it was with one specific team not being in the green.Am I not allowed to post link? Sorry, not sure about the rules with linking and embedding. Just LMK.