Cusesky8214
Living Legend
- Joined
- Nov 16, 2016
- Messages
- 11,704
- Like
- 37,582
He might take a page out of his book and only play 4 players.Will jb go gene hackman in Hoosiers for his pregame talk?
correct depends on results. Only thing that is none is we arent playing in hinkel if we advance as they are making the teams all change locations after every game until sweet 16
Can't play at Lucas since that's where WVU/Morehead is.
That's so funny to read after years and years of free throw suckdom.They are pretty solid from the line but not quite as good as us
Yep it's going to kick my butt!all nighter for Jim!
If it was 9:40 tonite I would have a hard time making it. All the way til Friday?Holy cow I'm already getting nervous for this game.
This is going to be the longest week of my life.
As Orangezoo pointed out earlier in this thread, SD ST was cool from the 3 pt line in their last 10 games (67-203) going 30%. Also, here is what they've done against the tourney and bubble teams:
W vs UCLA 73-58
L vs BYU 72-62
L vs COLO ST 70-67
W vs COLO ST 78-65
L @ UTAH ST 57-45
L @ UTAH ST 64-59
W vs BOISE ST 78-66
W vs BOISE ST 62-58
W (NEUTRAL) UTAH ST 68-57
They were 5-4 but 6 were at home. The home schedule helped them but they were hurt by having 2 games against NM cancelled or they might have 2 more wins. Overall, in my opinion even with the sparkling record and ranked 16th I can see why they didnt receive a better seeding. After wintering out west this year and catching quite a few MWC games on TV , all I can say is if that league got 4 teams (Boise St and Colo St) in the tournament it would have been a travesty. The tourney final was great for all the bubble teams. Watching that league will have you looking for the TV guide. Haha
Not sure where this post should go so I will post here.
I understand SDSU has cooled off a bit from deep their last 10 or so games. I don't put much stock into that though. They have 3-4 very capable shooters. If we are not careful, this could turn into the Baylor game from 2 years ago. Absolutely imperative we don't let them get good looks early. The defensive intensity has to be absolutely there from the start. I swear, if we see a 46% shooter get a wide open look from the top of the key on the first possession...
Not sure where this post should go so I will post here.
I understand SDSU has cooled off a bit from deep their last 10 or so games. I don't put much stock into that though. They have 3-4 very capable shooters. If we are not careful, this could turn into the Baylor game from 2 years ago. Absolutely imperative we don't let them get good looks early. The defensive intensity has to be absolutely there from the start. I swear, if we see a 46% shooter get a wide open look from the top of the key on the first possession...
Yep, agreed.Not sure where this post should go so I will post here.
I understand SDSU has cooled off a bit from deep their last 10 or so games. I don't put much stock into that though. They have 3-4 very capable shooters. If we are not careful, this could turn into the Baylor game from 2 years ago. Absolutely imperative we don't let them get good looks early. The defensive intensity has to be absolutely there from the start. I swear, if we see a 46% shooter get a wide open look from the top of the key on the first possession...
Sleep is overrated.Yep it's going to kick my butt!
Is Joe starting?...Not sure where this post should go so I will post here.
I understand SDSU has cooled off a bit from deep their last 10 or so games. I don't put much stock into that though. They have 3-4 very capable shooters. If we are not careful, this could turn into the Baylor game from 2 years ago. Absolutely imperative we don't let them get good looks early. The defensive intensity has to be absolutely there from the start. I swear, if we see a 46% shooter get a wide open look from the top of the key on the first possession...
Not sure where this post should go so I will post here.
I understand SDSU has cooled off a bit from deep their last 10 or so games. I don't put much stock into that though. They have 3-4 very capable shooters. If we are not careful, this could turn into the Baylor game from 2 years ago. Absolutely imperative we don't let them get good looks early. The defensive intensity has to be absolutely there from the start. I swear, if we see a 46% shooter get a wide open look from the top of the key on the first possession...
A couple players sounded excited, but pretty sure I heard another another guy go "Aw man."A little deceiving. I thought he came across very respectful and not at all overconfident. A couple of the players called out 2-3 zone as though they were excited which is probably a bit overzealous but Dutcher seemed very respectful and confident in his own team. Not much bulletin board in that interview to me.
Seth sending SDST to the elite 8. Good omen. He sucks picking games and picking our games.
He basically picked every 11, 12, 13 and 14 seed to win except us.
Last nice that dweeb picked a team (a 13 or 14 seed) and said "remember you heard it from me first". He picks about 2/3rd's of those games for the dogs and then will let people know when he gets its right.
What an asshat
Arkansas will handle Colgate like Cuse handled Montana in 2013Yeah he jumped all over picking Colgate and we all know he knows absolutely nothing about them.
Correct, different circumstances and Baylor is number 1 in all of d1 at 3pt shooting this year and have been elite since we played. Read that again... number 1.Yep, agreed.
But I'd also point out that a) our team in that baylor game was a complete mess after FH's er "exit" and b) as we're seeing this year (seeds of it in that game in '19) Baylor is a damn machine
Since no one will ever coach in 7 different decades that record is safe.