cliftonparksufan
Iggy Award Czar/Co 2020-21 Iggy Award Winner PPG
- Joined
- Aug 14, 2011
- Messages
- 18,094
- Like
- 32,510
Tiger Tracker Postscript. TT postscript: Only Tiger Woods' driver prevented a fairytale | Golf Channel
I was joking. I saw it. Tiger was all class waiting for Koepka to come in.
Koepka was nonchalant though about seeing his mom who supposedly was a surprise according to Nantz in being there. He was like oh hey how’s it going. To his mom.
I think the course needs to be commended. The PGA is always the redheaded stepchild, but even with some of the weather related issues, I thought the PGA did a great job with this course. I was expecting the worst and I thought it was very fair that it rewarded the players who made great golf shots. Plus the course seemed to be in great shape. I have no complaints at all about the course.Same. I watched for Tiger and also because I live down the street. I know the course didn’t impress anyone, but I think the fans did St. Louis proud.
I just rewatched it.He said fairly clearly I love you to his mother and gave her a big hug. What else was he supposed to do?
I just rewatched it.
He sees her and says "how are you?" I didn’t hear I love you I watched the whole thing.
Koepka is just a robot. Congrats to the guy he is a machine and deserves a lot of credit how the pressure never bother him.I thought I heard him say that but either way not sure of the point. He seemed like a gracious winner, really didn't find anything he did to be objectionable.
I agree with some of your points but on two points I disagree. With regard to Koepka's pedigree that is exactly why his accomplishments are so remarkable and worthy of tremendous attention. But that leads to the second point. You say Tiger is a minor factor as to why Koepka has not gained more fame and attention but then just ask yourself what kind of attention Koepka would be getting if Tiger was still on the shelf this season?
I will say Dustin has fans but he isn’t a fan favorite. So it’s no sure thing Koepka will get bandwagons.It may make Brooks done more remarkable, but the public, not only in golf loves young phenoms. It's part of why Tiger is so popular, and it's also why Rory and Jordan broke the wall more than others.
I don't think Tiger takes much away from him.. You ask why a 3 time major winner has not had any fanfare.. but his 3rd major happened 2 hours ago. People (or media) have yet to have the time to even process it or communicate it.
I think you have to give time for the Brooks legend to fester. AIf he stays on top of his game leading up to Augusta, is world #1 or #2, and he enters the tourney with 3 majors (not 2 like he did this week) he will have plenty of fanfare.
I agree with some of your points but on two points I disagree. With regard to Koepka's pedigree that is exactly why his accomplishments are so remarkable and worthy of tremendous attention. But that leads to the second point. You say Tiger is a minor factor as to why Koepka has not gained more fame and attention but then just ask yourself what kind of attention Koepka would be getting if Tiger was still on the shelf this season?
I will say Dustin has fans but he isn’t a fan favorite. So it’s no sure thing Koepka will get bandwagons.
Speith is a robot for sure and he is the guy after Rory of the young guys with large supporters.
It may make Brooks done more remarkable, but the public, not only in golf loves young phenoms. It's part of why Tiger is so popular, and it's also why Rory and Jordan broke the wall more than others.
I don't think Tiger takes much away from him.. You ask why a 3 time major winner has not had any fanfare.. but his 3rd major happened 2 hours ago. People (or media) have yet to have the time to even process it or communicate it.
I think you have to give time for the Brooks legend to fester. AIf he stays on top of his game leading up to Augusta, is world #1 or #2, and he enters the tourney with 3 majors (not 2 like he did this week) he will have plenty of fanfare.
Ah ok. It can be tough to tell with you sometimes.I was joking. I saw it. Tiger was all class waiting for Koepka to come in.
Koepka was nonchalant though about seeing his mom who supposedly was a surprise according to Nantz in being there. He was like oh hey how’s it going. To his mom.
Not much more. He is a dud of a personality and not overly bright in his interviews. He is the stereotypical athlete meathead.
It's kind of amusing how we (I do it too) judge people based off a few snippets of info or what the press tells us.
Un no. Listen to the guy talk. Total meathead. He could be a football player.
I really didn't pick up on that but then again you're used to listening to dumbasses like Jerrah so maybe u have a better ear for that than me.
I would consider Spieth the anti-robot. He's one of the most emotional players on tour imo.
Don't even get me started on jerrah.
Anyway Brooks and also Dustin seem like decent people but they are not the most scintillating interview. If you like them that's great. I personally want some one who can have an actual conversation with the people interviewing them.
It's kind of amusing how we (I do it too) judge people based off a few snippets of info or what the press tells us.
1. McIlroyRank the overall careers of the following:
Day
Garcia
D. Johnson
Koepka
McIlroy
Reed
Rose
Scott
Spieth
Stenson
Thomas
B. Watson
I agree with this - he could be a quiet, overly focused guy. I call him uncharismatic. But he may not be dumb. We have not seen enough of him.
I think we have seen enough of Dustin Johnson however to make certain conclusions.
Solid points all tho I would remind that he's a repeat US Open winner. Just seems like he hasn't received much fanfare for that.