I apologize for replying to my own post but I am not here to comment on it. Just to add a dissenting point of view.
Keith Law hates this move.
I just don't think thumbing your nose at history is good business.
theathletic.com
It is of course a pay site so many of you can't read it. But he basically points out that the vast majority of the time a relief pitcher coming off a great year signs a long term contract, it ends up being a disaster for the team that does the signing.
Relief pitchers are notorious for their inconsistency and just not worth the kind of money the Mets are spending.
I hated the trade for Cano with a fiery passion and have been openly disappointed with Diaz for much of his time with the Mets. But he has been pretty damn good and consistent for a while now.
I like that he is still in his 20s (for a little while) and to my knowledge, has never been hurt.
In the upcoming free agent class, there's no debate about the top available relief pitcher. Mets' closer Edwin Diaz is …
www.mlbtraderumors.com
And I think you have to take into account how popular a player is. How much the fanbase embraces him. Edwin is a big deal to Mets fans. Losing him likely affects attendance to some extent, maybe TV ratings too.
Let's get Brandon Nimmo and Jacob deGrom signed and I will be pretty happy.
For a bit.