OrangeXtreme
The Mayor of Dewitt
- Joined
- Aug 15, 2011
- Messages
- 227,102
- Like
- 406,682
Haven’t heard a word about playing Rutgers.
That good.
I couldn't spell Charalambides anyways.
Haven’t heard a word about playing Rutgers.
No Rutgers. Shame because they're a solid but beatable local this year . Would have drawn a good crowd whether home or awaySo we ended up avoiding the whole Rutgers deal.
Yes , you're getting ahead of yourself. Maryland will be a tough opponent to play any year even when Cuse returns to FF caliber .I do not have fond memories of the last time the Terps were in the Dome. Game was over after the first five minutes. A bit worried Gait might be biting off more than he can chew to be honest ...
In regards to the right time to play them, I think this year's Orange might be a better test for Maryland, Syracuse has a lot returning. Spallina will be very good, but the Orange will be looking to replace quite a bit, probably their entire midfield, DiPietro and Murphy if we assume they retain their starting roles, Phaup, Seebold ... I am excited for the freshman class in '23 year but the team will be awfully young. Maryland will lose a lot as well, but I have to think they will restock on the transfer market (more than Syracuse will at least). I'm getting way ahead of myself!
Gait had also mentioned doing a "Lacrosse Festival" of some sort in the Dome, curious what teams he had in mind for that. Also, I think the women's team played a lot of games back to back on short rest, I wonder if we see more midweek games with Gait in charge?
Does Albany move back to February, or does Scooby finally get their home game?
I have heard that Albany is definitely pushing for the home game they had scheduled pre-COVID (I may even have a credit on some UAlbany account), but that Syracuse has the leverage and that isn't lost on Albany. Believe Marr has a strong relationship with the Gaits though, and Gait is actually one of UAlbany's sponsors.
Same strategy here but 7-7, hopefully 8-5Hopkins clearly going for the get a 1st round home game despite finishing 8-8 strategy.
hopefully 8-6Same strategy here but 7-7, hopefully 8-5
I think you have to play the best whenever possible. This is a lot better than us starting some sort of softball new team on the schedule like Michigan or something. See where you stand, don't take any sort of loss in RPI, and hey who knows we could have a performance like our UVA games last year, especially since MD currently has a face off issue. Would rather play MD than a second round of UVA or ND like last year.I do not have fond memories of the last time the Terps were in the Dome. Game was over after the first five minutes. A bit worried Gait might be biting off more than he can chew to be honest ...
In regards to the right time to play them, I think this year's Orange might be a better test for Maryland, Syracuse has a lot returning. Spallina will be very good, but the Orange will be looking to replace quite a bit, probably their entire midfield, DiPietro and Murphy if we assume they retain their starting roles, Phaup, Seebold ... I am excited for the freshman class in '23 year but the team will be awfully young. Maryland will lose a lot as well, but I have to think they will restock on the transfer market (more than Syracuse will at least). I'm getting way ahead of myself!
Gait had also mentioned doing a "Lacrosse Festival" of some sort in the Dome, curious what teams he had in mind for that. Also, I think the women's team played a lot of games back to back on short rest, I wonder if we see more midweek games with Gait in charge?
Agree . Think it is important that our schedule/rpi is challenging because doubt cuse given much margin in selections this year given l1st rd flop ast year. Will have to beat some top teams and be competitive in losses against same.I think you have to play the best whenever possible. This is a lot better than us starting some sort of softball new team on the schedule like Michigan or something. See where you stand, don't take any sort of loss in RPI, and hey who knows we could have a performance like our UVA games last year, especially since MD currently has a face off issue. Would rather play MD than a second round of UVA or ND like last year.
Agree . Think it is important that our schedule/rpi is challenging because doubt cuse given much margin in selections this year given l1st rd flop ast year. Will have to beat some top teams and be competitive in losses against same.
I think you have to play the best whenever possible. This is a lot better than us starting some sort of softball new team on the schedule like Michigan or something. See where you stand, don't take any sort of loss in RPI, and hey who knows we could have a performance like our UVA games last year, especially since MD currently has a face off issue. Would rather play MD than a second round of UVA or ND like last year.
Dang I was totally assuming the playing two acc teams twice routine was a one year thing. If not that certainly changes things.We need to see if the ACC sticking with last years conf schedule is true, if it is your goign to get a second round of Duke and UNC plus Maryland.
We need to see if the ACC sticking with last years conf schedule is true, if it is your goign to get a second round of Duke and UNC plus Maryland.
Hear ya. Had felt the same but think fair success and competitiveness vs a schedule with a good rpi is needed this year to make playoffs. Easier said than domne, All four acc will once again be in or near top five those six games alone plus Maryland, JHU n a IvySU almost always plays a tough schedule but there's a point of going overboard. If the ACC is going with the extra games in conference vs the Tournament again this year I see absolutely no reason to schedule Maryland. I think staying with Rutgers at that point makes more sense. It's one thing to schedule a gauntlet when your a top 3 team it's another when your coming off a disappointing working in a new coaching staff and are picked to finish last in the ACC. A top RPI is great but it means jack if your under .500 and not tournament eligible. There has to be be a balance of tough games with some mid-level and some cupcakes. This isn't a squad that can play a top 15 team every week.
NoAren't we back to just 4 conference games and the ACCT?
Last year was a Covid adjustment.
Aren't we back to just 4 conference games and the ACCT?
Last year was a Covid adjustment.
No
Ivy is back and Big 10 is playing out of conference again...hard not to agree with thisThat's friggin stupid. Let's beat each other up so only 2-3 ACC teams make the tournament.
Hear ya JC but believe a schedule with top rpi is in best interests this year..Certainly be a difficult path to playoffs with 6 games agaisnt acc teams that will be in or near top five plus Maryland, JHU and likely Army and a IVY. NCAA took all five acc teams last year to some outcry but Cuse disappointed and now Ivies such as Yale and Cornell are back likely to take 1-2 spots besides some risers looking to place. Gait aint shying from competition , expect few soft games and many where we are clear underdogsSU almost always plays a tough schedule but there's a point of going overboard. If the ACC is going with the extra games in conference vs the Tournament again this year I see absolutely no reason to schedule Maryland. I think staying with Rutgers at that point makes more sense. It's one thing to schedule a gauntlet when your a top 3 team it's another when your coming off a disappointing season working in a new coaching staff and are picked to finish last in the ACC. A top RPI is great but it means jack if your under .500 and not tournament eligible. There has to be be a balance of tough games with some mid-level and some cupcakes. This isn't a squad that can play a top 15 team every week.
Hear ya JC but believe a schedule with top rpi is in best interests this year..Certainly be a difficult path to playoffs with 6 games agaisnt acc teams that will be in or near top five plus Maryland, JHU and likely Army and a IVY. NCAA took all five acc teams last year to some outcry but Cuse disappointed and now Ivies such as Yale and Cornell are back likely to take 1-2 spots besides some risers looking to place. Gait aint shying from competition , expect few soft games and many where we are clear underdogs
A question for Goldilocks. Real issue is all acc opponents are currently very strong and appear to have present edge whereas Cuse had the edge over two or three of them most years . UNC and ND had fluctuate between good and very good and recall UVA losing 18 consecutive acc games before turning it around. Regardless of acc format, we were playing acc teams a minimum of four times every year but mostly five or six times when in tourney so it's a added game or two agaisnt a top fiveish team. Maryland would certainly be a heavy add on. Respect traditions , always enjoy honoring Army or Navy regardless of outcome. Army likely a top ten this year, schedule them but just not in first game. Ease into season some . Be nice to reinstate local rivalries with Hobart and Cornell. Also rather be playing a more competent foe ie Vermont, Stony Brook and yes even Rutgers than a Sienna, Johns , Bingy Colgate were there is little upside. Understand the reservations on a taxing schedule, they do wear and tear and there is a need to decompress. Certainly wont be a road less travelled this yearA lot of hand wringing on here no matter how hard or easy the schedule is. So, what would everyone’s ideal schedule be? Not necessarily the order, but the teams.