Same storey year after year with the leafs. No grit, no D, and no goaltending. Goaltending wins cupsAnd this post summarizes the ignorance of those who can't lay large blame on the Core 4 Forwards in Toronto. You want to know one of the prime reasons your D and Goalie Sucks. Because you have limited financial resources to spend on them. That doesn't mean everything was done well putting them together either.
You can overcome that, IF the players you spent the majority of $ resources on perform to expectations. But those core 4 forwards. they always fall a bit short or often way short.
I think the reason why people don’t want to blame the core 4 is simple - once you’ve concluded the core 4 is the primary blame for playoff shortcomings (again?), you’re left with two options:And this post summarizes the ignorance of those who can't lay large blame on the Core 4 Forwards in Toronto. You want to know one of the prime reasons your D and Goalie Sucks. Because you have limited financial resources to spend on them. That doesn't mean everything was done well putting them together either.
You can overcome that, IF the players you spent the majority of $ resources on perform to expectations. But those core 4 forwards. they always fall a bit short or often way short.
One of the two was pretty weak in so far as that puck was going in whether goalie was contacted or notI thought the Tampa goal which Florida successfully challenged last night was obvious interference, the goal which was called interference and Tampa lost the challenge was closer but unlikely to be overturned. Curious what others thought.
Cooper complaining about it after the game was to be expected, but he went in a weird direction and ended up at “the league wants more goals so we should allow uncalled interference in the playoffs - goalies should get beat up just like the players”. Great coach, I get his frustration and agree with some of his issue -but it really shows how asking questions of people after a tough loss when they haven’t had a chance to formulate the idea in their head before speaking is an odd and imho unfair expectation we hold coaches and athletes to.
I watched the overtime goal replay about 10 times. If Samsonov comes out about 5 feet from his crease, he intercepts that bounce pass off the backboard and Pasternak doesn’t score. He stayed deep in his net. Also, Reilly got beat to the puck, never should have happened on a dump inAnd the leafs manage to blow another 3rd period game 7 lead
One of the two was pretty weak in so far as that puck was going in whether goalie was contacted or not
I watched the overtime goal replay about 10 times. If Samsonov comes out about 5 feet from his crease, he intercepts that bounce pass off the backboard and Pasternak doesn’t score. He stayed deep in his net. Also, Reilly got beat to the puck, never should have happened on a dump in
I watched the overtime goal replay about 10 times. If Samsonov comes out about 5 feet from his crease, he intercepts that bounce pass off the backboard and Pasternak doesn’t score. He stayed deep in his net. Also, Reilly got beat to the puck, never should have happened on a dump in
Watching it live and seeing Reilly not go after the puck in the corner, I thought that was the biggest issue. I thought Leafs outplayed Boston, but one defensive mental lapse cost them the game and the series.
Will be a very interesting offseason; I think they’ll be looking to move at least one of the core four to get a stellar d-man…but the no-trade clauses might make it impossible to get value back.
I think the interesting play will be Tavares. The Leafs do have some leverage to play with here as they can make a decision that costs Tavares nearly $3.7 million. As it is the last year of his contract, they can buy out Tavares which would save about $7.3 million in cap space next year (although would eat up 3.6M in 2025-2026).
The Leafs can tell Tavares he has 2 options:
1) You either waive your NMC and we are able to explore trades with you.
or
2) We buy you out, and you lose $3.7 million dollars.
Now trading Tavares with say 50% retention might not net you much. But that $5.5m of cap savings might get you a better player than Tavares for 2024/2025.
Tavares might actually need that $3.7 million given his current tax difficulties, due to the ridiculous advice he took from his tax accountants. He owes the CRA $18 million right now.
Reilly certainly got caught watching instead of playing.I watched the overtime goal replay about 10 times. If Samsonov comes out about 5 feet from his crease, he intercepts that bounce pass off the backboard and Pasternak doesn’t score. He stayed deep in his net. Also, Reilly got beat to the puck, never should have happened on a dump in
Marner did to. Pasternak was his man going into the D zone and just let him waltz by. Plenty of blame to go aroundReilly certainly got caught watching instead of playing.
Teams have their own defensive schemes, so it's hard to generalize. But most teams, through the neutral zone, try to funnel the puck carrier into a turnover, while cutting off passing lanes. I watched it a few times and didn't get to see the whole ice. But my guess is Pasternak came a little harder thru the neutral zone because he knew that play was on, and it surprised everyone. To that end, the dump in was perfect. Boston (whom I loathe) just made a great play in a huge moment.Marner did to. Pasternak was his man going into the D zone and just let him waltz by. Plenty of blame to go around
Marner is remiss in a lot of areas. Plays like he has a dozen eggs in his pockets ( thanks Grapes), and he doesn’t show up on the scoresheet. Add that to being a defensive liability…… Playoff hockey isn’t his thingTeams have their own defensive schemes, so it's hard to generalize. But most teams, through the neutral zone, try to funnel the puck carrier into a turnover, while cutting off passing lanes. I watched it a few times and didn't get to see the whole ice. But my guess is Pasternak came a little harder thru the neutral zone because he knew that play was on, and it surprised everyone. To that end, the dump in was perfect. Boston (whom I loathe) just made a great play in a huge moment.
I also thought through the game the Toronto players didn't create as much neutral zone interference as Boston was doing, so that could be where Marner was somewhat remiss?
Marner is remiss in a lot of areas. Plays like he has a dozen eggs in his pockets ( thanks Grapes), and he doesn’t show up on the scoresheet. Add that to being a defensive liability…… Playoff hockey isn’t his thing
I’ve always liked Berube. Hope he is the next coach
They all screwed up. Samsonov just puts hit stick out it never gets to the ass hat . Instead he retreated even deeper into his net like the delicate flower he is.How is Marner not getting a lot of blame for the last play? It was clearly his man. He was 4 feet ahead of Pastrnak at the red line when covering him, and then totally loses him coming out of the neutral zone.
No different than a breakout 3 on 3 play, if a forward loses his man coming through the blue line, the coverage blame is not on the D.