st bonny's was unexpected. they were 11 and 4 last year (lighter schedule). holy cross is a death knell when you combine the 2.the remainder of utah's schedule is going to drop them like an anchor. they won't finish in the top 20
had syracuse played cornell or army instead of st. bonaventure they'd be in much better shape right now
orange need to win 2 of 3 and root for hopkins in the big ten. the better the blue jays do the better it will be for cuse RPI. the ACC will be a wash so it doesnt really matter a whole lot in terms of cuse's RPI which ACC teams win/lose from here on out but hopkins is a chance for them to gain some ground. vermont winning the AE would also help
plus, nd, duke and uva are sitting so high on the rpi tree in gap down to 4+, having unc steal a game vs them probably helps, too.
thought about that, but my guess was all 5 in. and unc staying in top 10 even with a cuse loss. cuse top 5 or 10 sos, 2 top 5/10 wins, anywhere from 7/8 to 15 rpi.Only issue that I can see with this might be if it comes down for Syracuse and UNC for the last spot, I think UNC upsetting one of the trio would flip it in their favor.
Head to head - split, indecisive
Syracuse would have 1 top 5 win, UNC would have 1 top 5 win and an additional top 5/10 win with Hopkins.
But, I think, more than likely, both UNC and Syracuse would be in the field.
Great. Thanks very much for the clarification. I appreciate it.that is for the strength of schedule rankings that they consider. so cuse's sos is gonna keep jumping. it's already gone from mid/high 20's to 10 or 13 depending on where you look it up just in the last game or 2. it'll be top 10 and maybe top 5.
Weird because UNC has beat Hopkins and SU then all weak teams. Oh they beat Brown which Brown was without 6 players. If SU beats UNC and say Duke they will have Princeton, UNC and Duke which seem like better wins then what UNC has yet there in as of now most likely. That's confusing to me.it is what it is. seems like orange probably have to win all three. an RPI of 19 won't cut it.
the silver lining is winning all three gives them a very good chance. 10-5 with wins over unc, duke, and uva would be hard to deny. but doesn't seem like 2/3 is going to get them there
More context. Just seems wacky to me.
Weird because UNC has beat Hopkins and SU then all weak teams. Oh they beat Brown which Brown was without 6 players. If SU beats UNC and say Duke they will have Princeton, UNC and Duke which seem like better wins then what UNC has yet there in as of now most likely. That's confusing to me.
I know ur right it doesn't matter who was missing it's just as an SU fan knowing they were missing guys it's like cmonn. LolI could say a lot about this, but it's not worth sitting here typing pages and page of what-ifs and math-y stuff about this scenario before it actually happens.
So, I'll say for now: I endorse the above, minus the disclaimer about Brown because that part doesn't matter.
I think UNC probably needs to win one of their 2 games against Notre Dame to be in.Weird because UNC has beat Hopkins and SU then all weak teams. Oh they beat Brown which Brown was without 6 players. If SU beats UNC and say Duke they will have Princeton, UNC and Duke which seem like better wins then what UNC has yet there in as of now most likely. That's confusing to me.
here, to me, is a semi-major sticking point or 2 for 'cuse.More context. Just seems wacky to me.
iViEs aRe sO ToUgH - ThEy jUsT BeAt uP On eAcH OtHeRIt's odd that Holy Cross and St. Bonaventure can seemingly drag Syracuse down, but Yale can get annihilated by Cornell and Princeton and it has no impact. It's also odd that Syracuse can simultaneously have the 5th hardest schedule while being dragged down by its opponents winning percentage.