Comstock44
Scout Team
- Joined
- Sep 17, 2019
- Messages
- 425
- Like
- 681
Calling it a "lame appeal to authority" misses the point. I’m not saying debate isn’t allowed. It’s a sports board, of course people can disagree. What I am saying is that when a coach who’s put multiple WRs into the NFL over the years (don't forget USC and Alabama) both saw Cook as a starter‑caliber guy, that carries weight. That’s not shutting down debate or throwing crap against the wall. That's laying down facts and adding context.Dude, your just throwing crap against the wall. Never said he sucked, nor did I say I didn't want him back. I am of the opinion he is overrated as a superstar and drops too many balls. Calling him at his best 2024 Pena isn't a slight. I just saw too many drops and being caught from behind to label him a superstar. At this point I'd be shocked if he was a first rounder, I'd say ceiling is late rounder maybe mid round at the tip top the way he's played through the three years, and three separate teams. Id love to be wrong, but as of now he doesn't strike me as a game breaking wr.
Second your appeal to authority regarding Fran and Sarkisian opinion of Cook is a lame way to quash debate. It's a sports board, people are able to disagree, and if that is the standard I look forward to your 100 percent agreement with coaches decision going forward. And to be honest if he was a bonafide first rounder, Sarkisian would have done what's needed to retain him, or the Washington coach...
And let’s not rewrite history. You’re the one who labeled him a massive disappointment. I’m pointing out that the resume doesn’t match that take.
He got into trouble at Texas and Washington, that’s why he wasn’t retained there. But since coming to Syracuse he’s stayed out of trouble and by all reports has been a great teammate. That matters.
.