BlackKnight76
All American
- Joined
- Aug 15, 2011
- Messages
- 4,473
- Like
- 3,855
The last pick of the 8th round is Virginia Tech (Helps my mid atlantic pod)
And the first pick of the 9th round is California (Helps my USC pod...actually the State Flagship)
Alright these are some factors I will evaluate the conferences with tomorrow
Which conference will be the most profitable?
Who has the best overall conference?
Who has the best football conference?
Who has the best basketball conference?
Which conference will get the highest TV contract?
Which conference has the best geographic balance?
Which conference has the most academic prestige?
Which pick was the best value pick?
Which pick was the biggest reach pick?
Any FA schools a conference should sign and dump another school?
That was in the guidelines for drafting in the first post I made. This how they drafted.Funny that there is no mention of preserving natural rivalries, considering that on this board at least, that always seems to be the number one concern in any conference realignment.
I was pretty sure this was going to happen and illustrates why the Giants fan will ultimately get my vote...
The pix are getting dicier...just wait until you get to Northwestern, the Ivies or the MAC...
No way they are already applying to the MWC...UConn blocked their admission to the AAC.is there a waiver wire? i would love to find a way to get BC.
alright, cool. i have an idea, but i need to see what bees wants.If you want to dump a draft pick and use the waiver wire go ahead.
agree with Kaizer here - current 'profitability' is pretty meaningless as it is based on the current conference affiliation and their TV deals - which wouldn't necessarily be the case in their new conference if they're not benefiting from the nearby top teams. For instance - Purdue gets Big10 $ thanks to being in a league with UM, OSU, Wisky, PSU - but without the value they get from simply being aligned with those top programs they aren't worth squat - no one would care about them in any revenue sport.what forbes list were people working off? and why does it matter if the school ultimately makes a profit, the CONF is what its all about and if you have crap in your conf that nobody will like to watch, like indiana, miss st, vandy, iowa st and with kelly gone...his entire western pod, i see no reason why thats a feasable $$ maker.
since my conf makes sense, i dont have to do pods. i can do a North & South.
One correction, Arb has 3 MWC teams and 1 SEC team.Mark
1. (1)- Texas- Big XII
2. (8)- Southern California- Pac-12
3. (9)- Texas A&M- SEC
4. (16)- North Carolina- ACC
5. (17)- Arizona State-Pac-12
6. (24)- Kentucky- SEC
7. (25)- Arkansas- SEC
8. (32)- Virginia Tech- ACC
9. (33)- California-Berkley- Pac-12
10. (40)- Missouri- SEC
11.(41)- Illinois- B1G
12.(48)- Kansas- Big XII
13.(49)- Arizona- Pac-12
14.(56)- NC State- ACC
15.(57)- TCU- Big XII
16.(64) Ole Miss- SEC
Commissioner:John Swofford(sorry Arb you can make a trade to get him)
Mark drafted 5 SEC teams, 4 Pac-12 teams, 3 Big XII teams, 3 ACC teams, 1 B1G team.
I will summarize my criteria for all a little later once any trades or pickups are made.
Bees
1. (2)- Notre Dame- Independent/ACC
2. (7)- Michigan- B1G
3. (10)- LSU-SEC
4. (15)- Oregon- Pac-12
5. (18)- Auburn- SEC
6. (23)- Nebraska- B1G
7. (26)- Michigan State- B1G
8. (31)- Oklahoma State- Big XII
9. (34)- Washington- Pac-12
10. (39)- Kansas State- Big XII
11. (42)- Indiana- B1G
12.(47)- Mississippi Sate- SEC
13.(50) Vanderbilt- SEC
14.(55) Colorado- Pac-12
15.(58) Utah- Pac-12
16.(63) Iowa State- Big XII
Commissioner: Jim Delany
Bees has 4 SEC teams, 4 Pac-12 teams, 4 B1G teams, 3 Big XII, and Notre Dame.
Kaiser
1. (3)- Alabama- SEC
2. (6)- Ohio State- B1G
3. (11)- Oklahoma- Big XII
4. (14)- Georgia- SEC
5. (19)- Wisconsin- B1G
6. (22)- Tennessee- SEC
7. (27)- South Carolina- SEC
8. (30)- Virginia- ACC
9. (35)- Iowa- B1G
10. (38)- Miami(Fl)- ACC
11. (43)- Purdue- B1G
12.(46) West Virginia- Big XII
13.(51) Minnesota- B1G
14.(54) Texas Tech- Big XII
15.(59) Pittsburgh- ACC
16.(62) Duke- ACC
Commissioner: Mike Slive
Kaiser has 5 B1G teams, 4 SEC teams, 4 ACC teams, and 3 Big XII teams
Arb
1. (4)- Florida- SEC
2. (5)- Florida State- ACC
3. (12)- UCLA- Pac-12
4. (13)- Stanford- Pac-12
5. (20)- Penn State B1G
6. (21)- Louisville- ACC
7. (28)-BYU- Independent
8. (29)-Clemson- ACC
9. (36)- Maryland-B1G
10. (37)-UNLV- MWC
11. (44) Syracuse- ACC
12.(45) Georgia Tech- ACC
13.(52) Oregon State- Pac-12
14.(53) Washington State Pac-12
15.(60) Boise State- MWC
16.(61) San Diego State- MWC
Commissioner: Larry Scott
Arb has 5 ACC teams, 4 MWC teams, 4 Pac-12 teams, 2 B1G teams, and BYU.
agree with Kaizer here - current 'profitability' is pretty meaningless as it is based on the current conference affiliation and their TV deals - which wouldn't necessarily be the case in their new conference if they're not benefiting from the nearby top teams. For instance - Purdue gets Big10 $ thanks to being in a league with UM, OSU, Wisky, PSU - but without the value they get from simply being aligned with those top programs they aren't worth squat - no one would care about them in any revenue sport.
Thanks I will change it.One correction, Arb has 3 MWC teams and 1 SEC team.
4 mwc's? 3 mwc's??One correction, Arb has 3 MWC teams and 1 SEC team.
Obviously Arb thinks Boise State, San Diego State are better than the Eastern teams like Wake Forest, Rutgers, UConn or Midwest Northwestern, or Southwest Baylor. He was trying to maintain geography. I honestly am having a hard time determining which conference is best. He gave a good explanation for his picks and the other 3 are stacked. This year's conferences are better than last year's I think.