3-3-5 D and TCUs embarrassing, historically bad loss | Syracusefan.com

3-3-5 D and TCUs embarrassing, historically bad loss

swish7

Starter
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
1,998
Like
2,372
I read somewhere that TCU runs a 3-3-5 and we do too...
We recently hired the grandfather of the 3-3-5.
TCU just got walloped at a level never before seen.
Obviously their embarrassing beat down has nothing to do with the 3-3-5, but points to personnel and other i$$ue$, but what does this say about the 'shine / luster' of the 3-3-5, if anything?

Does it reduce its shine at all? Or, are we still all in on it being the D of choice for SU?
 

oldpinepoint

All American
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
5,227
Like
8,329
All in, what else are we supposed to do? It’s been successful for us, let’s worry about having a 2nd winning season next year before we panic about a defensive scheme that got shredded by a really good Georgia team.
 

Newhouser

All American
Joined
Jan 20, 2015
Messages
7,037
Like
12,689
I'm all in on it. We have no chance of getting the upper level DL's we need for anything else. TCU wasn't going to stop them but they hurt themselves with poor tackling early and their failure to check the QB run.

Bigger problem for anyone playing playoff level schools - your O-Line needs to be good and TCU's was not. A lot of their guys looked more like heavy good old boys than D1 players.
 

HRE Otto IV

All American
Joined
Jan 14, 2016
Messages
5,571
Like
8,666
There are different versions like the old WV D. That being said we can’t slow down UGA with 12 guys on the field so formation is trivial.
 

NYCCuse826

2nd String
Joined
Dec 23, 2022
Messages
826
Like
1,531
It has zip to do with the 3-3-5. Michigan torched them. Kansas State had their way with them as well. Big 12 teams by nature have to put up points because of the style of play. They couldn't stop anyone their last three games.
 

Trueblue25

Cali Award Magistrate; 2022 Iggy Winner: OOC Rcd
Joined
Apr 16, 2013
Messages
37,956
Like
74,163
Georgia’s line is on another level.

No scheme was going to save TCU yesterday.

If you’re relying on stopping Georgia’s d line and pushing their O line… you’ve already lost.

OSU and Bama cant do it either
 

money3189

Hall of Fame
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
9,087
Like
33,482
I read somewhere that TCU runs a 3-3-5 and we do too...
We recently hired the grandfather of the 3-3-5.
TCU just got walloped at a level never before seen.
Obviously their embarrassing beat down has nothing to do with the 3-3-5, but points to personnel and other i$$ue$, but what does this say about the 'shine / luster' of the 3-3-5, if anything?

Does it reduce its shine at all? Or, are we still all in on it being the D of choice for SU?
Odd fronts and 3-3-5 have been around for a long time. . Its not going away. TCU got beat by a faster and tougher team. I didnt love their game plan either. Im not a fan of having big slow guys as five tech's. They provided no pass rush and they were getting beat to the edge.
 
Last edited:

NYCCuse826

2nd String
Joined
Dec 23, 2022
Messages
826
Like
1,531
Georgia’s line is on another level.

No scheme was going to save TCU yesterday.

If you’re relying on stopping Georgia’s d line and pushing their O line… you’ve already lost.

OSU and Bama cant do it either
OSU had it under control when Harrison was still playing. Bama matched up with them last year as well until Jameson Williams went down. Those both swung the game decisively.
 

CbusCuse

Starter
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
1,925
Like
2,786
All in on 3-3-5. Our scheme has some weakness against really good big OL who power run but I think we can makes some scheme adjustments against those teams. Plus whose scheme does well against a really good big OL.


Also of note TCU size on DL goes:
1st string DL: 275, 320, 280
2nd string DL: 295, 315, 290

1st string LB: 240, 245, 230.

Very different than our personel.
 

money3189

Hall of Fame
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
9,087
Like
33,482
All in on 3-3-5. Our scheme has some weakness against really good big OL who power run but I think we can makes some scheme adjustments against those teams. Plus whose scheme does well against a really good big OL.


Also of note TCU size on DL goes:
1st string DL: 275, 320, 280
2nd string DL: 295, 315, 290

1st string LB: 240, 245, 230.

Very different than our personel.
Yup. Size helps for sure but in this case it didn't. They looked slow and unathletic up front. GA was able to get to the edge very easy and they had a lot of time to throw down field.
 

MikeSU02

Living Legend
Joined
Aug 15, 2011
Messages
10,644
Like
35,791
I read somewhere that TCU runs a 3-3-5 and we do too...
We recently hired the grandfather of the 3-3-5.
TCU just got walloped at a level never before seen.
Obviously their embarrassing beat down has nothing to do with the 3-3-5, but points to personnel and other i$$ue$, but what does this say about the 'shine / luster' of the 3-3-5, if anything?

Does it reduce its shine at all? Or, are we still all in on it being the D of choice for SU?

UGA spend on program, only public reporting: $80M
TCU: $40M
Cuse: $27M

Has nothing to do with 3-3-5.
 

qdawgg

Night Biking Enthusiast
Joined
Aug 15, 2011
Messages
12,245
Like
18,611
I’m confused by this thread. Are we supposed to be discussing whether we should get rid of the defensive scheme we use because of the results of 1 game we weren’t even playing in?
 

Grbac

2nd String
Joined
Mar 19, 2017
Messages
697
Like
2,389
It just shows what’s wrong with college football. The national championship is reserved for a handful of teams. Schools that spend ginormous amounts of money on the football programs. They will win. Schools like ours who don’t, will never sniff the title game in a million years.
Those big football schools have a ton of big fat millionaire and billionaire boosters who spend whatever it takes. We have one rich guy who owns a junkyard offering a comparatively small NIL contract for one guy. It’s just not the same I don’t care what defense or offense we run.
 

Ozone!

Graphics Wizard
Joined
Aug 3, 2019
Messages
4,582
Like
5,868
UGA spend on program, only public reporting: $80M
TCU: $40M
Cuse: $27M

Has nothing to do with 3-3-5.
That does not cover the booster moneys which used to be illegal and now are fixing the outcomes fro basketball and football!
 

Ozone!

Graphics Wizard
Joined
Aug 3, 2019
Messages
4,582
Like
5,868
I read somewhere that TCU runs a 3-3-5 and we do too...
We recently hired the grandfather of the 3-3-5.
TCU just got walloped at a level never before seen.
Obviously their embarrassing beat down has nothing to do with the 3-3-5, but points to personnel and other i$$ue$, but what does this say about the 'shine / luster' of the 3-3-5, if anything?

Does it reduce its shine at all? Or, are we still all in on it being the D of choice for SU?
IMO, no; Georgia is deep at all positions on 5 & 4 star players; put 5’s & 4’s in the 3-3-5 and then we would see for sure!
 

Doc5120

Starter
Joined
Aug 9, 2013
Messages
1,706
Like
3,479
I’m confused by this thread. Are we supposed to be discussing whether we should get rid of the defensive scheme we use because of the results of 1 game we weren’t even playing in?

Yes, duh!
 

Millhouse

Living Legend
Joined
Aug 16, 2011
Messages
27,759
Like
31,921
I read somewhere that TCU runs a 3-3-5 and we do too...
We recently hired the grandfather of the 3-3-5.
TCU just got walloped at a level never before seen.
Obviously their embarrassing beat down has nothing to do with the 3-3-5, but points to personnel and other i$$ue$, but what does this say about the 'shine / luster' of the 3-3-5, if anything?

Does it reduce its shine at all? Or, are we still all in on it being the D of choice for SU?
Georgia crushes every defense
 

Forum statistics

Threads
163,566
Messages
4,533,413
Members
5,714
Latest member
darrenm09

Online statistics

Members online
186
Guests online
636
Total visitors
822




Top Bottom