K
K Otto XLIV
Guest
Yeah, and I remember when the conventional wisdom in the late 1970s was that we could never draw even 27,000 to Archbold - why build a stadium holding more than maybe 30,000.
There are other answers to the observation.
First, I would rather have maybe 1,000 empty seats a few times per year rather than limit our crowds to 44,000 for the many big ACC and out of conference games that this program will attract as we get better and as the fans realize once again how much fun big time college football can be in the Dome. I agree with this. However history has shown it will be a lot more than maybe 1k empty seats. If SU had a Top 15 team this year we would not have sold out a 44k stadium for Rhode Island, Wake, or CMU. We didn't in 1998 when we had the perfect storm for attendance. Since then the changes to the environment make 1998 even harder to achieve. So you are talking more like 5-6k empty seats. That is a lot. And should we not be Top 15 you are looking at 10k empty seats.
We are now in the ACC - we have raised the level of play for the program and fans. Most fans don't care about Wake, NC St, Louisville, Pitt, and BC.
College football is more popular than it has ever been. Our competition continues to increase home capacity. Actually the opposite is true. Most programs have seen attendance decrease.
The Dome will continue to attract bigger name opponents. You can't have your capacity built around 1 OOC game.
The fans will come and will need more and more seats. We have never in the history of the Dome needed more seats. Why would we now? It also is a lot harder for SU to have a run like 1987-1998. So what happens when we are only an 8-4 team?
And, if we want to continue to attract bigger name opponents we will have to entice them with larger gates. Other schools really don't care about this.
And if we want to attract big time recruits, we need large crowds - that is what makes our BB program so appealing. Since FSU & Clemson have a lot more than 50k does that mean we are screwed? The recruits care about the atmosphere. That doesn't change with 44k vs 50k.
So, I think it's short sighted to hope for a reduction in capacity when an expansion of capacity is the better and more progressive approach. Again we didn't need 50k in 1998. We will never see a year like that where we have a Top 15 pre season team, HDTV not existing, not every game being televised, having Tennessee, VA Tech, and Miami all on the schedule, having a Heisman candidate, and having a larger population in CNY. Maybe we can have a great hoem schedule, Top 15 team, and Heisman candidate, but we cannot increase the population of CNY, limit the amount of games available on TV, or get rid of HDTV.
We should think as the Carrier Dome planners thought in 1978. They were wrong. They made the place too big.