I dont know nearly as much as others about the subject of conference realignment, if any at all. Just curious- why has Uconn not been added yet?
Close to MSG, arguably the top bball program of the last 15 years. Is it strictly football? Academics? Someone help me.
Why were we chosen? I'm genuinely curious.
Ask Richard Blumenthal. One of the more vile human beings on the planet.I dont know nearly as much as others about the subject of conference realignment, if any at all. Just curious- why has Uconn not been added yet?
Close to MSG, arguably the top bball program of the last 15 years. Is it strictly football? Academics? Someone help me.
Why were we chosen? I'm genuinely curious.
GoHamSU said:I dont know nearly as much as others about the subject of conference realignment, if any at all. Just curious- why has Uconn not been added yet? Close to MSG, arguably the top bball program of the last 15 years. Is it strictly football? Academics? Someone help me. Why were we chosen? I'm genuinely curious.
You've brought up a bad subject.
Seriously?
I don't think SU and BC want UConn in the ACC.
I don't think either wanted Rutgers.
I'll leave it at that.
Ask Richard Blumenthal. One of the more vile human beings on the planet.
I will leave the why we were chosen to others to address but to the why UConn is not be considered is really simple. The football powers of the conference don't want any more schools in what they consider to be 'recruit wastelands'. The feeling is there isn't enough talent in the NE to justify bringing in another NE school and that UConn does not offer anything the ACC does not already have.
I have also read from more than a few ACC posters that the traditional powers of the league (UNC, etc) don't like the way UConn handled the lawsuit and are holding a grudge over what they considered personal attacks.
I think UNC and company could eventually get over the hurt feelings but I don't think FSU, Clemson and VT will ever come around to another basketball school being added. So unless there is a departure of the league's major football schools I don't see UConn ever getting into the ACC.
So only we were allowed to be a school that is in 'recruit wastelands'?
What about the Big ten?
Football move. Actually, football move that benefited hoops. Win-win for us and the ACC. UConn had hoops. But not football history/brand/whatever-you-want-to-call-it. And the lawsuit did them no favors.I dont know nearly as much as others about the subject of conference realignment, if any at all. Just curious- why has Uconn not been added yet?
Close to MSG, arguably the top bball program of the last 15 years. Is it strictly football? Academics? Someone help me.
Why were we chosen? I'm genuinely curious.
So only we were allowed to be a school that is in 'recruit wastelands'?
What about the Big ten?
Football move. Actually, football move that benefited hoops. Win-win for us and the ACC. UConn had hoops. But not football history/brand/whatever-you-want-to-call-it. And the lawsuit did them no favors.
They took Rutgers
Ask Richard Blumenthal. One of the more vile human beings on the planet.
Football move. Actually, football move that benefited hoops. Win-win for us and the ACC. UConn had hoops. But not football history/brand/whatever-you-want-to-call-it. And the lawsuit did them no favors.
Lawsuit?
Really?
Go back to 2003 and relive SU's original move to the ACC.
Lawsuit filed by the BE left-behinds (led by the aforementioned Blumenthal - CT AG) after Miami and VT left the BE. SU wisely stayed out of it.I was 13. Following whatever this lawsuit was about was not my highest priority.
I know it was a a- joke on the football side, but Navy makes more sense, imo.