I think some of you are missing the context to understand the dynamics between team and coach. people view sports through the prism by which they approach their own life, and as employed adults most of us approach life with the idea of making as much money as we can, which as projected onto college sports is scholarship and playing time.
when it comes to sports, people sometimes talk about a guy being a locker room cancer or something because he doesn't play enough. I don't think that happens, almost never, cause the players keep that . . . . in check. the vast majority of the time the better player plays, and the thing about it is, that the players know who is better. if you have a player bitching about playing time, but the players know that the guy ahead of him is better, it doesn't even reach the coach. the players handle it.
the only time a coach can get in trouble is if he plays a favorite. at the high school level, the common mistake is that coaches play their own kids over upperclassmen. that is when you lose a team quick. as long as the coach plays the best players available, the team is fairly self-regulating because the players know who is better, if anyone does.
if Andrew white wants to throw his hat in the ring and play here, he knows exactly what the deal is. if he is better he will play, if he isn't he won't. only he can make the decision based on what it means to him.