Bench got some development minutes tonight.
Good to see.
Annnnd we’re still freaking out after 1 game. Lol.
One game is pretty good for this fan base. How many “game over” posts have we gotten over the years10 minutes into the first halfright after we lose the opening tip. I’d love to go and read the game thread for the Nova game where we down 22-5.
Not so fast.It doesn’t matter in the ACC because everyone has to get shut down for 14 days if anyone tests positive.
All the guys I named played at other schools and still stunk...or are currently in the process of stinking.
riddle me this .. did they force their way to SU or did we recruit and offer them? why we offering bums who can't play scholarships at such a crazy percentage? its either recruiting or coaching or both.
The problem is the minutes the bench used to get in the nonconference aren’t given to them.There’s a disconnect somewhere...kids who stink now but might have some raw potential seem to want minutes immediately instead of putting in work and earning them eventually as an upperclassman.
I couldn’t help but think last night how it would’ve been a nice chance for Washington(in normal times, if available - I know he opted out for health reasons)
He’s a PERFECT 4th guard at a school like SU. When even the Howard Washington’s are bouncing because they want PT now...I mean?
The problem is the minutes used to get in the nonconference aren’t given to them.
Because the starters aren’t good enough for blowout a lot of the nonconference teams.
JB used to play the bench early in the season and then shorten the rotation in January. That hasn’t happened because our talent has gone down.
Recruiting needs to be bringing in talent every year.
That’s true. But Washington actually got some real minutes in some of the big ACC games. There was a stretch where he was getting decent PT.
Goodine - we know he’s pretty athletic and a capable defender. He’s a kid whose shot might start dropping with time, experience, comfort. He was advertised as a decent shooter...it might just take time? Think of a kid like Nichols - one of our best shooters ever but he really didn’t shoot well until his junior year. These kids all seem to want it NOW, when they aren’t even good yet.
Not so fast.
Goodine would have done well here. It's pretty clear a lot of kids don't want to wait any more. I don't necessarily blame them. Not everyone enjoys that Club Trillion lifestyle. Realistically if you're not playing by year 2, I'm not sure you're ever getting off the bench here. But we haven't had anyone really test that in a long time. The only one I can think of somewhat recently was Rautins getting a huge bump in PT his 3rd year, I doubt he would have ever transferred.
My not so fast was in relation to the comment if one player is exposed the whole team will have to shut down for 14 days.Read his comments in today's Post-Standard, I don't think that Paulus was too pleased that his whole team just got exposed to the virus.
My not so fast was in relation to the comment if one player is exposed the whole team will have to shut down for 14 days.
We didn’t do that.
Which goes back to the OP where Tom Izzo said he has to play his bench to develop them in case a player becomes exposed then he has players ready to play. Instead of players who have just sat on the bench without playing time.
Regardless of the "willing to wait" part, don't you think that Boeheim should have used ONE of the other 3 guards for 10 minutes a game last year? Buddy & Joe still would have gone 35 minutes, for goodness' sake, but we might have kept one of those kids if he had chosen one to try to groom into a serviceable guard.
The problem is the minutes the bench used to get in the nonconference aren’t given to them.
Because the starters aren’t good enough for blowouts towards a lot of the nonconference teams.
JB used to play the bench early in the season and then shorten the rotation in January. That hasn’t happened because our talent has gone down.
Recruiting needs to be bringing in talent every year.
Carey or Goodine could have turned into decent players with time and patience. Who's to say that Carey couldn't have turned into a DeShawn Williams or Allen Griffen type of player, or that Goodine could have been another Scoop Jardine, Greg Monroe or Tony Bland. Not necessarily stars, but good enough players to be contributors in a rotation on a pretty good team.
They might surprise us. I guarantee there are no surprises to the coaches. They see these guys every day in practice.
We need to recruit better to where we have a playable bench - I agree there. I hope we’ve got one this year.
Coaches can be wrong, even JB, obviously. I don't think there's any doubt that a decent rotation of 8-9 would be preferable to 6 or even 7. But I think recruiting has been where we've struggled. Even where we've had successes they haven't been traditional -- Elijah was an under the radar kid who transferred in, Marek was a complete unknown, Woody, if he turns into something, was not a home run signing, etc.<sigh>. Coaches are never wrong. They know everything.
What about The Great Frankie Howard?Goodine would have done well here. It's pretty clear a lot of kids don't want to wait any more. I don't necessarily blame them. Not everyone enjoys that Club Trillion lifestyle. Realistically if you're not playing by year 2, I'm not sure you're ever getting off the bench here. But we haven't had anyone really test that in a long time. The only one I can think of somewhat recently was Rautins getting a huge bump in PT his 3rd year, I doubt he would have ever transferred.
It doesn't get talked about a lot, but I think one of the problems with the distribution of minutes last year was that neither of the bench options (Howard or Brycen) were able to back-up both guard spots. And so that 10 minutes per game essentially ended up getting split between two kids, and neither of them was happy about it.Regardless of the "willing to wait" part, don't you think that Boeheim should have used ONE of the other 3 guards for 10 minutes a game last year? Buddy & Joe still would have gone 35 minutes, for goodness' sake, but we might have kept one of those kids if he had chosen one to try to groom into a serviceable guard.
What about The Great Frankie Howard?
Coaches can be wrong, even JB, obviously. I don't think there's any doubt that a decent rotation of 8-9 would be preferable to 6 or even 7. But I think recruiting has been where we've struggled. Even where we've had successes they haven't been traditional -- Elijah was an under the radar kid who transferred in, Marek was a complete unknown, Woody, if he turns into something, was not a home run signing, etc.
No doubt our recruiting has taken a hit in the last five years, but our scheduling has changed considerably in the 21st century (for a variety of reasons).
There are way less cupcakes on the nonconference schedule now than there were 20 years ago. And on the whole mid majors are a lot more competitive than they were 20 years ago. No more scheduling the Washington Generals with the walkons playing the last 10 minutes.