DoctahLexus
Renowned lacrosse analyst
- Joined
- Jun 8, 2018
- Messages
- 4,344
- Like
- 9,101
I hear you. Today certainly sucked. It is a crazy dynamic taking a womens head coach right over to the mens game (a major shift, even with his success as a player) and an aging veteran legend head coach and put him as an assistant for the first time (another massive shift). It’s the type of thing that will take time to build, put that on top of essentially having the same personnel out there that the previous coach got fired while playing with…yeah it’s gonna take time. That’s why it feels to early to speculate on things being fundamentally broken off the field etc.What I'm saying is the optics could reflect some tension and or confusion behind the scenes. It does not project confidence and I can see a scenario in which it's negatively impactful on the players.
What worked for the women's team may not necessarily work for the men's team. The games are different, the rules are different, the ways in which you communicate with the players are different. Being quiet and hands off with the women clearly worked for him but there is a possibility that these young men require more energy and/or interaction to feel like they are bought in. You look at a guy like Dano who does not coordinate either side of the ball and isn't drawing up plays himself but when the camera cuts to him he always looks engaged. He's talking to his assistants, he's leading a team huddle, he's doing something to signal that this is his team and he has a handle on it. To be clear I am NOT saying to fire Gait or anything ridiculous like that but I also think it's fair to be concerned about the dynamic we're seeing on the sideline because it may be representative of a deeper issue.