Fair enough. But to jump to the conclusion that his decision was based on how much he “values” education or not, is being presumptuous, IMO.
Suppose he places a high value on his education but simply decided that at this time, going the G-League route was the better option?
If he makes a $100 million over the next few years, takes classes online and earns his degree, would that suffice as to whether he values education? Or is the only determining criteria that he goes to SU for a year, play acts the role of student, and then goes to the Association?
Point being we don’t know- so why assume that his decision was based on educational values, or lack thereof, at all?
*Note: Oh, and now I’m really finished. This time i mean it!