pretty sure it was just last year.Hasn't Brey won the darn thing almost every year?
Hasn't Brey won the darn thing almost every year?
well, Marquette hasn't had Gardner for the past 3 games (all wins) and we were able to beat Cinci and WV without Fab...I would vote for him for luckiest coach of the year.
SU without Melo, Marq without their center.
2 sure losses on the schedule become wins out of thin air.
Sure, he's done a great job getting them even to .500 in conf. But they have had some very good scheduling luck recently.
So they would have beat us if we had Fab?well, Marquette hasn't had Gardner for the past 3 games (all wins) and we were able to beat Cinci and WV without Fab...
He lost Tim Abromaitis who was probably their best player to an ACL so i wouldnt say he is that luckyI would vote for him for luckiest coach of the year.
SU without Melo, Marq without their center.
2 sure losses on the schedule become wins out of thin air.
Sure, he's done a great job getting them even to .500 in conf. But they have had some very good scheduling luck recently.
He recruits to his system very well. Unlike a lot of other coaches he just doesn't throw schollys at every top 100 player.I don't understand why seemingly every thread has to turn into some hate fest. Are people that insecure, angry, and naive to admit that the guy's done a great job? He's not the "luckiest" coach, he's not a "terrible" recruiter, and they've won at Lou, SHU, and UCONN, contrary to the assertion that they only win at home.
3 of the last 5 according to Axe.
No hate, insecurity, or anger on my part. Just explaining the facts that Notre Dame basketball recruits on a level equivalent to Butler (or worse) at this point. They've gone a decade without a significant recruiting class, nowhere near the Top-25. The alums are getting restless with his moving the program into a "good enough to win some quality games" but "no where near good enough to get past the first weekend of the NCAA tournament or even into the NCAA tournament."
Nothing I said earlier is incorrect. Yes, Brey has found a style that ssuits the talent (or lack thereof) on his team to make the sum of the parts greater then their individual abilities. This is what we all should ask for in a coach and Brey should be commended. However, it is entirely his fault that there isn't a single player on the ND team with the ability to carry the team on his shoulders. By not being able to attrack any top level talent, Brey has left himself no other alternative to field a competitive team.
As for the academic fallacy - it simply isn't true. Any NCAA Clearinghouse qualified football or basketball player is accepted to Notre Dame. Period.
Ben Hansbrough and Luke Harangody were good but not top end recruits (Hansbrough was a transfer from Mississippi State). The problem is that Brey cannot attrack top end talent.
He has not had a recruiting class worth a damn in the last decade. That's okay for a cycle or two, but not for a decade. That kind of recruiting simply would not be stood for at Syracuse or any other program that gives one iota about their hoops team, especially one that allegedly has some of the top resources and selling points that Notre Dame claims to have.
I'll butt in here.Then couldn't you make these same comments about Stanford? The nature of the beast is Notre Dame doesn't have very good facilities for basketball. What selling points does Notre Dame claim to have in regards to basketball? My dad is a Notre Dame alum and he watches every basketball game, but cares much, much more about football.
I think you answer your own question. Notre Dame doesn't care about their hoops team (as long as they aren't horrid). Which makes the job Brey has done that much more impressive. Football gets all the money at Notre Dame (my dad even acknowledges this).
If Brey had a "Harangody Center", I am sure he would recruit a lot more high end talent.
So, since Hansbrough was a transfer, does JB not get credit for getting Wes Johnson in your eyes?