CardiacCuse
All Conference
- Joined
- Oct 18, 2018
- Messages
- 3,466
- Like
- 6,647
didnt a PF just commit to lousivulle though?Sounds like that visit tomorrow may be Louisville based on twitter chatter. I'd really hate that.
didnt a PF just commit to lousivulle though?Sounds like that visit tomorrow may be Louisville based on twitter chatter. I'd really hate that.
Yep. And they just got a commit from a 4-star freshman (Booths - decommitted from Michigan) that is listed as a SF/PF (depending on site). They also have two other SFs and 2 Centers that transferred in this offseason. That is a pretty crowded front court.didnt a PF just commit to lousivulle though?
Yet we can't ruffle Lampkin's feathers.Yep. And they just got a commit from a 4-star freshman (Booths - decommitted from Michigan) that is listed as a SF/PF (depending on site). They also have two other SFs and 2 Centers that transferred in this offseason. That is a pretty crowded front court.
Hypothetically, a lineup of Lampkin, Freeman, Bell, Waterman and Starling is possible... Nobody else has been promised a starting spot.
If he starts at guard, I would be curious how opponents defend us. Technically, Starling would be our point guard, and Waterman would be taller than both our forwards from the guard position.
Somebody from our opponents would be trying to guard somebody way taller than them.
Would they be able to punish us enough on the other end to make us come out of it? It might be interesting for 4 minutes at the start of the game, and then we can move into a more traditional rotation after that. It would be similar to when JB clearly had token starters in order to honor recruiting commitments back in the day.
But Waterman wouldn't get Boeheimed after getting pulled.
Not to dwell (but I guess I am), but one of the most frustrating things about JB's unwillingness to move on from the zone was his love for those types even though the same things that made them weapons in the back made them injury-prone and limited on the offensive end.Unfortunately, our recent history with bigs reinforce that bad feeling. I don't know if we've just rolled snake eyes a few times in a row, but Coleman, Sidibe, Hima, McLeod, Chukwu, Edwards and Onuaku are big men who all had severe, season ending or career affecting injuries in the last 14 seasons.
I'd go so far as to say we've had more big men suffer injuries than stayed healthy over that time period. Christmas, Jackson, Keita and Lydon (playing out of position) are the only guys who stayed healthy and productive their whole career. Big men just seem to be fragile, or we've been really unlucky.
And Coleman, Hima and Sidibe never actually recovered.
So, yeah, you might be irrational thinking that McLeod might be toast, but a lot of us share that fear. With good reason.
yeah no way louisville should now be able to beat SU for a PF recruit given thisYep. And they just got a commit from a 4-star freshman (Booths - decommitted from Michigan) that is listed as a SF/PF (depending on site). They also have two other SFs and 2 Centers that transferred in this offseason. That is a pretty crowded front court.
Heard he's buddies with Sam ElliottWho’s McCloud?
No, I was thinking Waterman could handle the ball well enough where we could survive with a 3 forward lineup for short periods. Waterman had some pretty impressive dribbling highlights. Freeman can handle it as well. Nobody would be putting Bell at guard.Very little ball handling plus a lot of guard playing matador defense. Think you believe that Bell can play guard. Bell can stand on one side of the floor and shoot.-
Hypothetically, a lineup of Lampkin, Freeman, Bell, Waterman and Starling is possible... Nobody else has been promised a starting spot.
If he starts at guard, I would be curious how opponents defend us. Technically, Starling would be our point guard, and Waterman would be taller than both our forwards from the guard position.
Somebody from our opponents would be trying to guard somebody way taller than them.
Would they be able to punish us enough on the other end to make us come out of it? It might be interesting for 4 minutes at the start of the game, and then we can move into a more traditional rotation after that. It would be similar to when JB clearly had token starters in order to honor recruiting commitments back in the day.
But Waterman wouldn't get Boeheimed after getting pulled.
I think we should start every game with 6 players on the court… take the immediate technical while simultaneously checking all of our starter commitment boxes, and keep it moving from there
Are we actually talking to him or is this board speculation? He looks excellent in the vid
You know if a team has 6 players on the court and the refs don’t catch it and that team scores a basket, it would actually count.I think we should start every game with 6 players on the court… take the immediate technical while simultaneously checking all of our starter commitment boxes, and keep it moving from there
Somebody get Higgins out of retirement, that guy couldn't see anything when he was young!You know if a team has 6 players on the court and the refs don’t catch it and that team scores a basket, it would actually count.
Bell belongs at SG. Forwards muscle him. At shooting guard he would have a height advantage and be on the perimeter. With 3 bigs up-front we can protect the paint.Very little ball handling plus a lot of guard playing matador defense. Think you believe that Bell can play guard. Bell can stand on one side of the floor and shoot.-
If Bell had his current elite shooting, and a well rounded game, we could get away with that.Bell belongs at SG. Forwards muscle him. At shooting guard he would have a height advantage and be on the perimeter. With 3 bigs up-front we can protect the paint.
There is basically no one Bell could cover as a teo. Not to mention he lacks the ball handling and passing skills necessary. Especially if you’re thinking of Starling, a pure 2, as the point.Bell belongs at SG. Forwards muscle him. At shooting guard he would have a height advantage and be on the perimeter. With 3 bigs up-front we can protect the paint.
Why? What is this for?I know it’s only 1 year. And call me crazy. I would prefer this kid over bell.
What do you mean, what is this for? I would take this kid and play him more minutes than bell. Bell is 1 dimensional. He can’t dribble, can’t drive, can’t play defense, can’t rebound. I would plug this guy at the 3 in place of bell. I would go with Carlos, JJ, Waterman, Freeman, Lampkin. Westry and Bell would be first guys off the bench.Why? What is this for?
It's just ironic that in this transfer portal world on the one hand there's all this hand wringing about how there's no point developing players anymore because chances are they're just one year players and it's not the college basketball landscape we used to know, and then on the other hand we have a player in Bell who we're actually watching develop over multiple years in the program and all off-season we've had posters engineering fanciful ways out of nowhere to dump him or replace him because they don't actually appreciate his game.What do you mean, what is this for? I would take this kid and play him more minutes than bell. Bell is 1 dimensional. He can’t dribble, can’t drive, can’t play defense, can’t rebound. I would plug this guy at the 3 in place of bell. I would go with Carlos, JJ, Waterman, Freeman, Lampkin. Westry and Bell would be first guys off the bench.
Still doesn’t solve our PG issue. But I think this would be a much better front line.