Class of 2023 - C Owen Freeman (IL) Portal to Auburn | Page 37 | Syracusefan.com
.

Class of 2023 C Owen Freeman (IL) Portal to Auburn

They are paid players and recruiting is easy now and not important. We just write a check. Clearly not the case. If they don’t want to play here then we need to fix the reason. In the meantime we need a coach like a Fran brown type that can sell it. Gmac and staff aren’t closing, That the facts. St. John’s couldn’t recruit. Pitino came in sold the dream then brought money in and he turned it around. Cal did the same thing at Arkansas.

The portal hasn’t even closed yet let alone nor are we done so how are you professing opinions as certified facts including not seeing one single new addition yet play a minute of basketball at SU let alone seeing what improvements are made by those returning.
 
I don't know that is true or fair. Gerry didn't close with two guys that we all remember as an ass't. He was going against Cal and K. Jb at his best got beat by those guys and he was a Head coach. Second, we didn't know who are top targets were or are. We certainly closed on Doty, Aiden, and 3M. Not to mention White or Anthony. I don't think it is fair to not include the guys we got when we are talking about closing. I honestly don't think having a dog recruiter is as important as it once was in the days of NIL. How much are you offering seems to have replaced having a great relationship with the players. I don't think any of us will know what we look like as a team until we see them play as a team. Obviously we need a 5. I think we should wait until we get one before we climb on the ledge.
I’m not disagreeing with you at all. I’m jaded by years of the football team being under funded and being told player x with 2 stars is a diamond every other p4 team missed to only see the undersized kid get pushed around. This class to me seems to fit the under funded football teams that lost for 20 years. Su couldn’t land the top coaches and then sold us on not being culture fits. They sold us on gmac needing a fork lift to move the money he is bringing. Outside looking in we don’t have the money and we aren’t selling the players. If I’m wrong I’ll admit it but this is a fan page and to crap on anyone that doesn’t toe the line is crazy.

Bees is a respected poster and a mod so when he posts we moved on because of health or something, outsiders should take that as fact but clearly it’s money and he has the audacity to call people out for being wrong while pushing a bs narrative that makes the staff look more competent after they lost a key prospect. Again if I’m wrong I’m wrong, if things were going well there wouldn’t be all these posts of concern and the board would be quite
 
I would rather have a coaching staff that can truly evaluate talent than one who is a great closer on top names but doesn’t know if they really can get the job done.
Red was a great closer, main reason he got the job in the first place.
But Nait George, and others, show there are other things more important than stars and transfer portal rankings.
 
I’m not disagreeing with you at all. I’m jaded by years of the football team being under funded and being told player x with 2 stars is a diamond every other p4 team missed to only see the undersized kid get pushed around. This class to me seems to fit the under funded football teams that lost for 20 years. Su couldn’t land the top coaches and then sold us on not being culture fits. They sold us on gmac needing a fork lift to move the money he is bringing. Outside looking in we don’t have the money and we aren’t selling the players. If I’m wrong I’ll admit it but this is a fan page and to crap on anyone that doesn’t toe the line is crazy.

Bees is a respected poster and a mod so when he posts we moved on because of health or something, outsiders should take that as fact but clearly it’s money and he has the audacity to call people out for being wrong while pushing a bs narrative that makes the staff look more competent after they lost a key prospect. Again if I’m wrong I’m wrong, if things were going well there wouldn’t be all these posts of concern and the board would be quite
sold us? What big time coach would want to come here? This isnt Syracuse from 20 years ago. College athletics have changed dramatically and the brand isnt the same and people just need to accept that.

The move to the ACC killed this university whether anyone wants to admit it or not. We havent been the same since and quite frankly will never be what we were.
 
Agreed, the caveat being if we had a ton of cash I think we could convince more guys to suck it up by grossly overpaying.
But why do you want that player. Sure we need talent but culture and work ethic matter not just how much you have to spend. Also coaching. So many chicken little posters on this site. I like coming on the forum but it’s getting to the point that it’s 80% negative.
 
sold us? What big time coach would want to come here? This isnt Syracuse from 20 years ago. College athletics have changed dramatically and the brand isnt the same and people just need to accept that.

The move to the ACC killed this university whether anyone wants to admit it or not. We havent been the same since and quite frankly will never be what we were.
We probably won’t ever be what we were that’s a reasonable bet. We do have to start somewhere to try. Which means you have to do it with a combination of things to go with good money. It’s not a money ball approach but it’s also not a super team approach either. You put together 12 - 15 guys who want to be here even if it’s for a check, a deep staff that has a history of developing players, a staff committed to the details and work to game plan and prepare extensively and look to find that groove where the right combination works and proves your concept. If you can do that your ceiling as a program gets a lot higher.

A good staff that effectively does all that is worth 3-5 million in portal dollars maybe a little more. That’s the calculus you a have to look at. If you have a 12 million dollar roster and a staff that can make that a 16 million dollar roster then you have something.

We had an 8 million dollar roster with a zero to negative value staff last year as an example and the results showed.
 
I’m not disagreeing with you at all. I’m jaded by years of the football team being under funded and being told player x with 2 stars is a diamond every other p4 team missed to only see the undersized kid get pushed around. This class to me seems to fit the under funded football teams that lost for 20 years. Su couldn’t land the top coaches and then sold us on not being culture fits. They sold us on gmac needing a fork lift to move the money he is bringing. Outside looking in we don’t have the money and we aren’t selling the players. If I’m wrong I’ll admit it but this is a fan page and to crap on anyone that doesn’t toe the line is crazy.

Bees is a respected poster and a mod so when he posts we moved on because of health or something, outsiders should take that as fact but clearly it’s money and he has the audacity to call people out for being wrong while pushing a bs narrative that makes the staff look more competent after they lost a key prospect. Again if I’m wrong I’m wrong, if things were going well there wouldn’t be all these posts of concern and the board would be quite
I hope you aren't saying that I crapped on your opinion because I didn't. I disagree with it. Money is always going to be an issue but we have money to compete this year. We are not at the top of the heap and anyone that said that would have been wrong. As wrong as the people that think we are one of the sisters of the poor. Wrong on both counts. A lot of money came in with Gerry. More than we could probably of had with any other choice. And if you don't remember, Gerry wasn't my first choice. But I will give the devil his due. no other coach that we were considering would have raised the money that Gerry has. We have spent a great deal of money to get the guys that we have got. I have heard what we have offered Freeman. It would make Omaha sick.
 
Can we please stop talking in absolutes? If we do not land a guy, it does not mean Gerry cant close. It does not mean we do not have the money to pay guys. I am seeing so much hyperbole on this board in the last month, it is crazy. There are so many other factors in play when it comes to the portal. No one knows what the final roster will look like at this point. All of these threads continue to get hijacked with arguments.
Earlier in the portal, I totally agreed with our decision to not overpay for mediocre bigs--paying $3 million for a totally average big is dumb and would be a repeat of when we blew our whole budget on Lampkin. Now that the portal is almost closed and most of the top talent is off the board, I think it's very fair to question whether Gerry can close/whether we have enough NIL money. Unless Siby is ready to start and play major minutes, we have a huge hole up front and would be essentially punting the season if we don't add more size. I'm a big fan of Doty, Tobiason and Dual (and the euros too, though idk much about them), but if our most proven big is Goodrick, it'll reframe our whole approach to the portal and make it look like that we were dumpster diving for scraps rather than being savvy with our resource allocation
 
sold us? What big time coach would want to come here? This isnt Syracuse from 20 years ago. College athletics have changed dramatically and the brand isnt the same and people just need to accept that.

The move to the ACC killed this university whether anyone wants to admit it or not. We havent been the same since and quite frankly will never be what we were.
Just to clear no one wanted to leave the Big East but also the Big East will be a dead conference in less than 5 years. The minute Uconn decides to leave and Pitino is done it will collapse. It's a 3 bid league over 2 of the last 3 seasons and there is nothing left for these schools. They will be at best a decent midmajor.

The ACC even for all it's terribleness put a team in the Natty game for football last year and although for hoops ACC teams have been choking and not making runs I still got 8 bids and I expect them to get 9 next year.
 
Earlier in the portal, I totally agreed with our decision to not overpay for mediocre bigs--paying $3 million for a totally average big is dumb and would be a repeat of when we blew our whole budget on Lampkin. Now that the portal is almost closed and most of the top talent is off the board, I think it's very fair to question whether Gerry can close/whether we have enough NIL money. Unless Siby is ready to start and play major minutes, we have a huge hole up front and would be essentially punting the season if we don't add more size. I'm a big fan of Doty, Tobiason and Dual (and the euros too, though idk much about them), but if our most proven big is Goodrick, it'll reframe our whole approach to the portal and make it look like that we were dumpster diving for scraps rather than being savvy with our resource allocation
Once again, we should wait before we push the panic button. We don't know what we don't know.
 
But why do you want that player. Sure we need talent but culture and work ethic matter not just how much you have to spend. Also coaching. So many chicken little posters on this site. I like coming on the forum but it’s getting to the point that it’s 80% negative.
Wasn't arguing that was smart policy, just that recruiting is different these days. Not sure the fit matters as much as it used to, if colleges are overpaying.
 
Earlier in the portal, I totally agreed with our decision to not overpay for mediocre bigs--paying $3 million for a totally average big is dumb and would be a repeat of when we blew our whole budget on Lampkin. Now that the portal is almost closed and most of the top talent is off the board, I think it's very fair to question whether Gerry can close/whether we have enough NIL money. Unless Siby is ready to start and play major minutes, we have a huge hole up front and would be essentially punting the season if we don't add more size. I'm a big fan of Doty, Tobiason and Dual (and the euros too, though idk much about them), but if our most proven big is Goodrick, it'll reframe our whole approach to the portal and make it look like that we were dumpster diving for scraps rather than being savvy with our resource allocation
Guys are still entering the portal and there is still talent available. We were never going to get a top 5-10 big guy. The guy from App State looks promising and we are a player there. We also have seemingly built in roads with European guys, which is another option. We are not done yet, there is still time.
 
Just to clear no one wanted to leave the Big East but also the Big East will be a dead conference in less than 5 years. The minute Uconn decides to leave and Pitino is done it will collapse. It's a 3 bid league over 2 of the last 3 seasons and there is nothing left for these schools. They will be at best a decent midmajor.

The ACC even for all it's terribleness put a team in the Natty game for football last year and although for hoops ACC teams have been choking and not making runs I still got 8 bids and I expect them to get 9 next year.
Yes. We would have been crazy not to leave and going to the ACC saved us. We could forget about havinga football program if we had refused the offer. And if we didn't have football, well, the consequences would have been horrible. Yeah, we miss the Big East for hoop but even that, look at who is in the league now. It isn't the same league we left.
 
I hope you aren't saying that I crapped on your opinion because I didn't. I disagree with it. Money is always going to be an issue but we have money to compete this year. We are not at the top of the heap and anyone that said that would have been wrong. As wrong as the people that think we are one of the sisters of the poor. Wrong on both counts. A lot of money came in with Gerry. More than we could probably of had with any other choice. And if you don't remember, Gerry wasn't my first choice. But I will give the devil his due. no other coach that we were considering would have raised the money that Gerry has. We have spent a great deal of money to get the guys that we have got. I have heard what we have offered Freeman. It would make Omaha sick.
Just to play devils advocate, if we're offering a lot of money for Freeman and lose him to Auburn, wouldn't that mean that Gerry can't close? Auburn has an even less proven head coach than we do; it's not like they're a blue blood. Money being equal, we should be the better destination. If we're offering Freeman a lot of money and Gerry can't beat out Bruce Pearl's idiot kid, that doesn't reflect too well on the program's standing
 
Just to clear no one wanted to leave the Big East but also the Big East will be a dead conference in less than 5 years. The minute Uconn decides to leave and Pitino is done it will collapse. It's a 3 bid league over 2 of the last 3 seasons and there is nothing left for these schools. They will be at best a decent midmajor.

The ACC even for all it's terribleness put a team in the Natty game for football last year and although for hoops ACC teams have been choking and not making runs I still got 8 bids and I expect them to get 9 next year.
well i am talking about the last 13 years where the BE has multiple hoops nattys. Any these ACC teams playing in the football natty doesnt really mean jack for us as we havent even sniffed it so Im not sure how that helps us aside from extra cash.
 
Guys are still entering the portal and there is still talent available. We were never going to get a top 5-10 big guy. The guy from App State looks promising and we are a player there. We also have seemingly built in roads with European guys, which is another option. We are not done yet, there is still time.
Agree about the App State guy and screw Freeman. A lot less money and think AO could do wonders with App State guy. Freeman to me is looking for a hefty paycheck.
 
Just to play devils advocate, if we're offering a lot of money for Freeman and lose him to Auburn, wouldn't that mean that Gerry can't close? Auburn has an even less proven head coach than we do; it's not like they're a blue blood. Money being equal, we should be the better destination. If we're offering Freeman a lot of money and Gerry can't beat out Bruce Pearl's idiot kid, that doesn't reflect too well on the program's standing
Not neccessarily. I didn't say we were paying more than Auburn was. I don't know that. I only know what I was told we offered. Maybe Auburn offered a great deal more. Or maybe Freeman doesn't like snow. Texas Tech alledgedly offered more to Aiden than we did. Did Gerry close with him?
 
Not neccessarily. I didn't say we were paying more than Auburn was. I don't know that. I only know what I was told we offered. Maybe Auburn offered a great deal more. Or maybe Freeman doesn't like snow. Texas Tech alledgedly offered more to Aiden than we did. Did Gerry close with him?
Screw Freeman and move on.
 
I can accept us getting outbid by Kentucky but the bs statement from bees saying we backed off because of “health issues” or something is load of crap being out out there for losing the players. the common narrative is we are losing players and aren’t closing on our priority ones. This brings us back to gmac not landing the target recruits we wanted when he was an assistant. This is exactly what people were worried about and it’s clearly happening. If we don’t have the cash others do then we need to have the Fran brown type recruiter sealing the deal. It appears we don’t have the dog recruiter. I have no doubt gmac and couch up the kids but when your playing against p4 talent you aren’t going to be able to out coach these teams regularly. Talent more times than not wins. This is not me being negative this is me seeing the teams I love failing year after year and reading the comments from the insiders saying every year we are improved. This is not an improvement from last year. We have zero p4 proven talent. All we have are the “diamonds in the rough” we Su fans hold out hope actually panning out which almost never do. As it stands This is going to be another missed ncaa tourney roster
you struggle with the word possibilitie.
 
well i am talking about the last 13 years where the BE has multiple hoops nattys. Any these ACC teams playing in the football natty doesnt really mean jack for us as we havent even sniffed it so Im not sure how that helps us aside from extra cash.
UConn has had a historic 4 year bball run and the athletic department still runs a $50+ million deficit every year because basketball money pales in comparison to football money. And unlike UConn which gets money from the state, Syracuse is private, so a deficit that big would have huge ramifications for the rest of the school.

The Big East only makes financial sense for schools that don't play football. As someone who doesn't really care about football, I'd be fine with that trade-off, but I think I'd be in the minority.
 
UConn has had a historic 4 year bball run and the athletic department still runs a $50+ million deficit every year because basketball money pales in comparison to football money. And unlike UConn which gets money from the state, Syracuse is private, so a deficit that big would have huge ramifications for the rest of the school.

The Big East only makes financial sense for schools that don't play football. As someone who doesn't really care about football, I'd be fine with that tradeoff, but I think I'd be in the minority.
im not saying we should have stayed in the BE im just pointing out that the ACC move has been awful
 

Forum statistics

Threads
175,306
Messages
5,347,289
Members
6,233
Latest member
SUtoga

Online statistics

Members online
305
Guests online
8,327
Total visitors
8,632


Top Bottom