I'm asking this sincerely, and am admitting to not being nearly as knowledgeable as some members on this. Are these early season big boards a lot more reliable than the early season top 25's? Obviously I know much can change, but I'm trying to gauge if they are more reliable this early because of whom is doing the grading, etc? As for the bracketology thing yesterday, Lunardi is fortunate enough to have a schtick and it makes sense for him to milk it for all it's worth instead of waiting until it's more realistic, even with the obvious flaws of listing an impossible ACC champ. I'm just curious if these big boards are substantially more reliable than that, this early. Clearly they have to be better, but how much at this point?