orangecuse
Hall of Fame
- Joined
- Aug 28, 2011
- Messages
- 8,419
- Like
- 13,845
You are either underestimating the intelligence of the Board or overestimating your own.
At least be intellectual honest with yourself. Negative characterizations like "alleged rock star," and "try not to take yourself so seriously" sure seemed derogatory in intent. But yup, you did not question his "resume."
Unjustifiably, I couldn’t respond to your subsequent post until now. The alleged rock star reference was made as this is an anonymous cyberspace forum, where folks roll with aliases versus their true identity. Case in point, your 007 moniker…unless, of course, you’re truly a British special agent?
If Dasher (or anyone for that matter) subjects themselves to “aggravation” while making voluntary posts (again, on an anonymous web sports forum) then yeah, perhaps one shouldn’t take it/themselves so seriously. Hence, the count to ten/breathing reference, as well as the emoji at the end of my original post; an attempt in keeping the matter light. Preserving my “intellectual honesty,” if you maintain thinking it’s a negative characterization and/or derogatory assertion, so be it. As with anything, folks will interpret, believe, etc. things as they see fit.
The premise was one of affect, emotional impact, etc. The weight of any emotion, positive or negative (negative here due to the ‘aggravation’ admittance) exists based upon the level of attention one voluntarily chooses to give it. Therefore, comprehensively, why give it any attention at all?
I’ll stand by my viewpoint that I wasn’t questioning Dasher’s track record, or success thereof, relative to his connections, accuracy, etc. Something I haven’t ever done with him related to this particular subject matter.
Interestingly, I received an immediate two-week ban, yet the deemed objectionable post remained. Other than perhaps, intentionally and unfairly being left hung out to dry, one can only imagine as to why that was?