interesting. certainly is a believable story.Okay, here is my understanding of the story from what I consider to be a very good source..Dan was given a position in S&C not replacing Hicks...Dan subsequently started looking for another gig..Marrone found out and terminated him...
I ran a fairly large company. Each time a manager would come to me and say " I heard that so and so is looking for a job" my reply was always the same. It is on us to create an enviornment so positive that people want to work here. You can never blame an employee for looking. Why wouldnt Dan or any other coach look? They have year to year contracts and DM has just let him go. So much for my comment on Doug being a class act in this situation. Unfortunately im not surprised
Respectfully disagree. If DM knows a guy might leave, why would he want him to stay? He is in the process of cleaning up his staff and doesn't want to do it twice. His staff and players need to focus on getting better, not who is leaving.I ran a fairly large company. Each time a manager would come to me and say " I heard that so and so is looking for a job" my reply was always the same. It is on us to create an enviornment so positive that people want to work here. You can never blame an employee for looking. Why wouldnt Dan or any other coach look? They have year to year contracts and DM has just let him go. So much for my comment on Doug being a class act in this situation. Unfortunately im not surprised
Respectfully disagree. If DM knows a guy might leave, why would he want him to stay? He is in the process of cleaning up his staff and doesn't want to do it twice. His staff and players need to focus on getting better, not who is leaving.
Side note (no inside info): I feel like there is more to the story than I've read here. Somebody wasn't getting along or something. DC wasn't fitting in.
Maybe he trusts Schafer's opinion more than his own, and I'm only half kidding. Schafer calls the shots with the D is what I'm guessing.What bothers me is that Marrone deemed conley more of a problem then Hackett
Okay, here is my understanding of the story from what I consider to be a very good source..Dan was given a position in S&C not replacing Hicks...Dan subsequently started looking for another gig..Marrone found out and terminated him...
What bothers me is that Marrone deemed conley more of a problem then Hackett
not according to what Hoov50 was hearingMaybe he trusts Schafer's opinion more than his own, and I'm only half kidding. Schafer calls the shots with the D is what I'm guessing.
Sounds like a familiar story. Year one was Spence and the O. Last year Cassulo and ST's. Now Schafer and the D?not according to what Hoov50 was hearing
he said that at the end of the year, HCDM was micro-managing the D side of things and very involved with the D
Don't know..my understanding is that Marrone and Conley butted heads during their time together and Conley was "Marrone's whipping boy" as it was told to me..Maybe he trusts Schafer's opinion more than his own, and I'm only half kidding. Schafer calls the shots with the D is what I'm guessing.
uninformed opinion but what i've come to expect from a certain few here.What bothers me is that Marrone deemed conley more of a problem then Hackett
I wish the PS would get to the bottom of all this.