orangemass
All American
- Joined
- Aug 29, 2011
- Messages
- 5,941
- Like
- 8,896
Schollies being used. Does that mean you have to let all but 3 walkons go if that number remains intact? If so that’s harsh
Yet people are wringing their hands about not pounding the portal.Schollies being used. Does that mean you have to let all but 3 walkons go if that number remains intact? If so that’s harsh
Why exactly is that an excuse to not find better talent. This is a business and we shouldn’t be keeping people if the position can be upgraded.Yet people are wringing their hands about not pounding the portal.
Agreed.. in the old days, when they were amateur student athletes, I would say keep them on to get their degrees etc but now being professional athletes with the portal, we need to manage the roster like what they are. ProfessionalsWhy exactly is that an excuse to not find better talent. This is a business and we shouldn’t be keeping people if the position can be upgraded.
The scholarship limit is also 105.Roster limit is 105. Scholarship limits still remain.
Don’t think that’s accurate.Roster limit is 105. Scholarship limits still remain.
This is exactly what's wrong with college sports. Turning it into a business and not a sport that is about TEAM.Why exactly is that an excuse to not find better talent. This is a business and we shouldn’t be keeping people if the position can be upgraded.
I don't think many walk-ons fall into the category of professional athletes. It will be sad to see them being squeezed out of the program.Agreed.. in the old days, when they were amateur student athletes, I would say keep them on to get their degrees etc but now being professional athletes with the portal, we need to manage the roster like what they are. Professionals
If they still have the desire to play, lower division college football may be their ticket.I don't think many walk-ons fall into the category of professional athletes. It will be sad to see them being squeezed out of the program.
Are there walkons playing at a P4 school at any position other than special teams? Wait until some walk-on is responsible for tearing the ACL of a $4M NIL player.I don't think many walk-ons fall into the category of professional athletes. It will be sad to see them being squeezed out of the program.
Not unheard of for a walk on (or former walk on who was awarded a scholarship) to be playing on offense or defense for a p4 team.Are there walkons playing at a P4 school at any position other than special teams? Wait until some walk-on is responsible for tearing the ACL of a $4M NIL player.
Why exactly is that an excuse to not find better talent. This is a business and we shouldn’t be keeping people if the position can be upgraded.
I was always under the impression that P4 scholarships were year by year basis. D3 is different but not D1.Because you can’t just “cut” kids
As power conference school our scholarships are required to be guaranteed for 4 years.
Sure you can have a “talk” with a kid but if they decide to not leave you can not force them
With 37, I think it becomes a numbers game.I think this is the problem with a class of 37 players. How many of those players will never see meaningful time on the field. I really think the team needed great help on the defensive side of the ball and the portal was the way to fix it.
I was always under the impression that P4 scholarships were year by year basis. D3 is different but not D1.
Thus, D1 can cut after the one year and tell them to hit the portal. Many schools, like SU, still honor the scholarship but it won’t count towards football if the kid wants to stay for school only. I have no idea if that will continue with 105 scholarships now but historically this has been the case.
You are correct as it did change in 2015:And you would be wrong…
In 2015 the “power conferences” passed a rule that scholarships had to be guaranteed for four years