Scooch
Living Legend
- Joined
- Aug 27, 2011
- Messages
- 17,821
- Like
- 61,526
Duke and Wake have a "good perception"? Maybe they're seen as acceptingly mediocre by us die-hards, but I don't think they even make the radar of most non-ACC college football fans.As a fan I love this game. But look at 2012 as an example of over scheduling. We had a good team yet we only went 7-5 that year because we had 11 BCS games (USC, Northwestern, Minny, Mizzou all OOC). That team deserved to be ranked. In 2025 the same could happen as we have 10 P5 games and 0.0 FCS games.
Meanwhile in 2025 other ACC teams could easily go 8-4 because they schedule soft.
Duke- Illinois, Liberty, at MTSU, at Tulane
NC State- East Carolina, Campbell, at ND, at LA Tech
Wake- Army, Western Carolina, at Liberty, at Ole Miss
The above three schools have not been all that much better than SU the last 10 years but they have a good perception because of their yearly soft OOC scheduling.
The issue isn't playing Tennessee but playing Tennessee and ND.
Look, I get it, people are terrified of overscheduling. We've done it in the past, for sure. But I do think we need to set aside what transpired in the Big East era -- the program was in an entirely different place, revenue-wise. And we had an AD who wasn't great with the whole scheduling thing to begin with.
To me, ND is a quasi-conference opponent. Hell, we play them more often that we do 6/14ths of the rest of the ACC! So I don't think we can flee from other opportunities in the years where they're on the schedule.