Pitino knows how to attack the zone. And he always has talent. So he wins most of the time. The zone works because it's based on playing the percentages. Most teams don't know how to attack it...and fewer have the talent to do it.
This is getting tiresome . The talent levels of these two programs is not so different as to explain the result
Maybe Donna will ask Jimmy B at the presser.
That cap is a little higher when we inexplicably have to hope for a split with Pitt and can't beat UNC.It kind of puts a cap on what you can accomplish if you have a team in your league who's good for giving you 1-2 L's every year.
Well that's one way of looking at a coach's Hall of Fame career.JB does his thing and if you beat it, oh well.
It kind of puts a cap on what you can accomplish if you have a team in your league who's good for giving you 1-2 L's every year.
That is UNC before they get hit with crippling sanctions.That cap is a little higher when we inexplicably have to hope for a split with Pitt and can't beat UNC.
That is UNC before they get hit with crippling sanctions.
Ok, but you're paraphrasing Steve Lappas here. Not exactly a great way to bolster any argument.to steal a line from the announcers Pitino game plans to attack your weaknesses, JB does his thing and if you beat it, oh well.
If Lappas is only able to articulate Boeheim's style of coaching in such limited terms then that certainly explains why he hasn't coached in so many years.Ok, but you're paraphrasing Steve Lappas here. Not exactly a great way to bolster any argument.
He did mention that he helped JB and Slick Rick become HOFers. True enough and one of the few things he said today that made sense.If Lappas is only able to articulate Boeheim's style of coaching in such limited terms then that certainly explains why he hasn't coached in so many years.
I think these two iterations have a pretty big talent disparity. Snider is a good solid, PG, and Mitchell is better than Battle at this point. The frontcourts aren't even close. They have several athletic, physical big men, while we really only have Thompson, who is very raw. Lydon, White and Roberson are way too soft to contend with that. Same reason we can't compete with UNC.This is getting tiresome . The talent levels of these two programs is not so different as to explain the result
I'm more optimistic that our non-compete clause for road games expires at the end of the year.This is getting tiresome . The talent levels of these two programs is not so different as to explain the result
If Lappas is only able to articulate Boeheim's style of coaching in such limited terms then that certainly explains why he hasn't coached in so many years.
Lappas made accurate comments on JB's style and was on point. Lappas had a winning record against JB as a coach head to head. This was also when our talent level was superior to Nova's as well.
For one no he doesn't have a winning record it is like 9-5 or something like that when Lappas as at Nova. Secondly we did not have equal talent.Lappas made accurate comments on JB's style and was on point. Lappas had a winning record against JB as a coach head to head. This was also when our talent level was superior to Nova's as well.
Boeheim doesn't have a losing record against Lapas when he was at Nova so you are wrong about that. Also our talent level wasn't superior to Nova. They had a team with Kittles and Lawson that was a 3 seed and then the Tim Thomas team. They probably had slightly more talent that us. Kittles and Thomas were both top 10 picks. I don't remember us having a top 10 pick during this time. Please correct me though if I'm forgetting somebody.Lappas made accurate comments on JB's style and was on point. Lappas had a winning record against JB as a coach head to head. This was also when our talent level was superior to Nova's as well.