I understand both sides. To me, commitment has two definitions. The real life definition which means an unwavering promise. And then there is the recruiting definition, which is a momentary pledge. If you are a coach that won't take a commitment until the kid is 100% and he understands that the commitment goes both ways and no other visits will be allowed and the school will not look for anyone in his spot, then that is cool. But, if the coach pressures a kid into a commitment using all tactics possible, accepts the commitment, continues to recruit for that players position while telling him no other visits, then that coach is a scumbag. I am not saying that is what makes Franklin a scumbag, it is just part of what makes him a scumbag. I do prefer Shafer's approach. He preaches family, he doesn't seem to pressure kids and he wants them to be 100%. I think when you get a team full of fully committed players, they will work their butts off for eachother, like this group does.