It will only be a few minutes now that the idea is out there...And those were the days of “assigning “ the number. This is not that and to me the most innocuous way of it happening with simply just it being a guy keeping his old number. Social media makes this a bigger deal. Eddie isn’t out there making videos of himself as “the next 44” with highlights jdub and DC leading up to it…
Notre Dame still recruits with "win one for the gipper."It's the same football IMO. Which is 44 means more to alumni/fans than a HS player. The school could pitch it sure but the longer things stay in the past the less current players will care.
Closest thing to being worthy - agreed.I think Freeman would have been the natural choice... A top10 recruit at the historical power forward position that normally has worn #44?
No doubter.
We didn't unretire 44 for Lampkin. The number is available every season.Do you think North Carolina would unretire #23 and let a kid wear it just because that was the number they wore before?
Closest thing to being worthy - agreed.
To me the people saying no big deal are just a reflection of how much our programs deteriorated and how cheapened the sports became with NIL.
I didn't say we did.We didn't unretire 44 for Lampkin. The number is available every season.
A couple things...
- The fact that Eddie wore 44 at previous stops doesn't matter. Do you think North Carolina would unretire #23 and let a kid wear it just because that was the number they wore before? Hell no. What number they wore before is irrelevant. Now that said, maybe Eddie being able to wear #44 was part of the negotiations, which is fine by me. Not ideal, but ok.
- I'm in the camp of giving 44 to a guy like Freeman over Lampkin. That said, I don't really have a big problem with it. No one outside Syracuse cares, but if Lampkin lays an egg next year, that can water the number down. Hopefully Eddie will represent the number well.
I'm aware. Wasn't my point.It was never retired
So there's no problem.I didn't say we did.
Good to hear.So there's no problem.
I'm aware. Wasn't my point.
YesSo how does the example compare then? Is DC our MJ ? I’m not sure we’ve treated him as such or we’ve held 44 in such a regard since J Dub to deem in so important in hoops.
Yes
JB hasn’t recruited anyone in the last ten years worthy of wearing 44. Fans forgot it’s still available.Whoop-de-damn-do.
Agreed, but as pertains to storytelling, I think DC says he wore it in honor of George GervinNotre Dame still recruits with "win one for the gipper."
I think 44 can be strongly relevant in both sports with the right storytelling.
We didn’t use it the almost 20 years before that either when we regularly recruited studs thoughJB hasn’t recruited anyone in the last ten years worthy of wearing 44. Fans forgot it’s still available.
I can't argue with that.You know, everyone that cares about the #44 is gonna die someday and then no one will care about it anymore.
yeah, but just think about how great those who wore it get to feel! They never have to see anyone else out perform their legacy. It selfish and childishYou know, everyone that cares about the #44 is gonna die someday and then no one will care about it anymore.