Just as a foreword, I'm not asking the question to be confrontational -- I really just don't care all that much about the rumor mill, etc for about 90% European soccer, Arsenal included, and I know there are Gunner fans on here.
Just looking at Kroenke's teams:
- in the last 10 years, Arsenal is spending commensurate with where they spent the 10 years before he bought (right around no. 15 in the world in net and gross expenditures).
- The Avs have had a lot of success with him.
- The Nugs have been very good to excellent except for one 5 year stretch during his tenure
- The Rams have the normal up and down success that most NFL teams without Belichek have, but they have a Super Bowl, an NFC championship, maybe the best stadium in the NFL, and a pretty damn good roster right now, all while Kroenke was part of the ownership group.
I get he doesn't spend like some other owners (quite frankly, I don't think he has the alternative motives of elevating his families reputation, his nation's reputation, money laundering for Russian Oligarchs, etc...) but I just don't see this as a 'Major League' situation like some make it out to be. It seems like the club is slightly left behind by the influx of owners alluded to above and the lack of a mind like Wenger who really did know how to expertly run a large club from top-to-bottom like few truly could.
What am I missing in all the hate he's getting?