tep624
Living Legend
- Joined
- Aug 26, 2011
- Messages
- 12,087
- Like
- 30,301
All things equal - you take the guy that brings the talent.If we actually reach the ceiling of “we have top talent, and lack the coaching chops to get over the top” then we are in a much better place than we are now, and are more likely to bring in a guy with top coaching credentials then.
let’s say the top two candidates reach their strength ceiling and weakness ceiling
- Brown brings in top talent, arguably consistent top 3-5 classes in the ACC, buts he’s not a good enough coach to take advantage of it and consistently have us competing for ACC titles, sadly we fall short and are roughly middle of the pack each year.
- Chesney is a program builder and talent developer. He is universally a top 3-5 coach in the ACC and always has us outperforming low recruiting classes (bottom 5 in the ACC) and we consistently end up in the middle of the ACC.
both are positive steps forward from today and we would be happy to be there right now. But if we were in that spot and lost our coach for whatever reason And needed to replace them, which situation has the program in a more attractive location for the next HC hire? one could argue both are essentially the same result, improvement to mid tier ACC play. I wouldn’t make that case
I’d argue Brown does, because the talent is there for a new coach to win with, and Cuse has now cultivated a hotbed in the recruiting fronts and has players excited about joining us.
thats how I’m thinking about it, and I understand why we might be siding with the recruiter and counting on that skill to carry us forwards
Chesney will bring over his HC guys, will manage a well run program, but will struggle to improve our talent level and therefore has a natural built in ceiling.