For 40mpg 3.25 isn’t that bad at all.
It's mediocre at best.
For 40mpg 3.25 isn’t that bad at all.
It's mediocre at best.
It's mediocre at best.
Here are the turnovers per 40 minutes for some recent SU point guards:Not really considering how many he had early. 2.1 per 40 the last 13 regular season games. And I see you didn’t like the other post and ignored it.
Here are the turnovers per 40 minutes for some recent SU point guards:
2018 Howard 3.6
2016 Gbinije 3.0
2014 Ennis 1.9
2013 MCW 3.9
2012 Jardine 3.6
2012 Triche 2.4
2010 Jardine 3.4
2010 Triche 3.8
2009 Flynn 3.6
2008 Flynn 3.1
2003 Edelin 4.0
2003 GMac 2.8
At best.They’re all mediocre.
Not really considering how many he had early. 2.1 per 40 the last 13 regular season games. And I see you didn’t like the other post and ignored it.
Here are the turnovers per 40 minutes for some recent SU point guards:
2018 Howard 3.6
2016 Gbinije 3.0
2014 Ennis 1.9
2013 MCW 3.9
2012 Jardine 3.6
2012 Triche 2.4
2010 Jardine 3.4
2010 Triche 3.8
2009 Flynn 3.6
2008 Flynn 3.1
2003 Edelin 4.0
2003 GMac 2.8
At best.
Amazing what those teams were able to accomplish.
Why cherry pick certain games? Why not use all 20 ACC games instead of a 13 game stretch? You used per 40 minutes but another way to look at it is per possession. SU's style of play this year on both ends of the floor dictated that there were far fewer possessions than what most teams would have in a game and yet he still averaged well over three turnovers.
This is why I hate per 40 mpg stats. Frank’s are actually 40 mpg. I guarantee other production would go down with increased mpgHere are the turnovers per 40 minutes for some recent SU point guards:
2018 Howard 3.6
2016 Gbinije 3.0
2014 Ennis 1.9
2013 MCW 3.9
2012 Jardine 3.6
2012 Triche 2.4
2010 Jardine 3.4
2010 Triche 3.8
2009 Flynn 3.6
2008 Flynn 3.1
2003 Edelin 4.0
2003 GMac 2.8
Do yourself a favor and look at the stats of dozens of PGs around the country and Frank's stats (TOs, assist to turnover ratio, FG% and 3 pt FG %) are easily bottom quartile.
I wasn't cherrypicking. I just chose some bigger name point guards on some of SU's better recent teams to see how often those guys turned it over. You can draw your own conclusions.Cherry picking again, eh? What about 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 211, 2015 and 2017? Even still Howard is toward the bottom of the pack. Be curious to see how his shooting stats would compare to those other PGs. My bet he'd be down near the bottom on those as well.
Wait, your center is not supposed to pass it out when he’s 2 feet from the hoop?His stats are about the same as MCW who ironically helped lead us to a 30 win season.
I don't get the complaining about Frank. The 4 and 5 are the reason we stink.
It's the same as when people complained about Triche when he was a point guard playing the 2. Dumb.
I've heard JB and our incompetent big man coaches actually require them to do that.Wait, your center is not supposed to pass it out when he’s 2 feet from the hoop?
And your 4 is not supposed to pump fake a wide open shot, dribble into the lane and get the ball stripped?
Who’s cherry picking? I said he had a lot early on. Saying he finished strong isn’t cherry picking. Strange post.
I wasn't cherrypicking. I just chose some bigger name point guards on some of SU's better recent teams to see how often those guys turned it over. You can draw your own conclusions.
Would you take Frank over any of those PGs?
This is why I hate per 40 mpg stats. Frank’s are actually 40 mpg. I guarantee other production would go down with increased mpg
I think a better measure would be assist to turnover ratio as opposed to per 40 mpg.
His stats are about the same as MCW who ironically helped lead us to a 30 win season.
I don't get the complaining about Frank. The 4 and 5 are the reason we stink.
It's the same as when people complained about Triche when he was a point guard playing the 2. Dumb.
Not even close. MCW's assist to turnover ratio was nearly double that of FH in MCW's sophomore year. He shot five percentage points better from the field and nearly doubled FH's rebound totals. He was a helluva lot better on the defensive end, too. Frank's only edge was from three and both stunk in that regard.
Probably not, but I've seen the SU careers of all the others in their entirety, and I never saw how any of those others performed when asked to never come off the court.Would you take Frank over any of those PGs?
That's a tricky one. He has fewer opportunities for assists than most PGs but with assist opportunities come more turnover opportunities.I think a better measure would be assist to turnover ratio as opposed to per 40 mpg.