kcsu
Living Legend
- Joined
- Aug 27, 2011
- Messages
- 22,946
- Like
- 53,873
You are correct. If you look at the revenue/distribution chart that Tom posted the next 6 years are extremely profitable for ESPN. However, after 2030 their margins decrease significantly unless the chart doesn't take into effect the additional revenue as a result of the Tx and CA markets. Also, every school other than the new additions will be receiving a disproportionate share of the distributions.That's interesting.
It has been argued somewhat emphatically here that ESPN is embedded as a major benefactor in this "sweetheart" type deal. That their deal with the ACC is well below the alleged market value. So, why would ESPN opt out in 2026 and give up such a profit maker for them, especially, if the GOR is as Iron Clad as alleged? Wouldn't they just stay put, not opt out, continue to reap their significant profits and (due to the plaintiffs extremely alleged weak position, et al) let the disgruntled remain disgruntled until they inevitably bolt down the road (2030 range or thereabouts anyways) when the GOR doesn't carry as much financial weight?
Bottom line the current deal without any additional concessions by ESPN or any new revenue through other sponsorships and creative partnerships places the ACC in a solid third position. One that will enable it to raid the Big 12 when their deal is up for renewal.