richmondcuse03
All American
- Joined
- Sep 1, 2011
- Messages
- 4,448
- Like
- 18,702
This was what I was told back in November by a source who would know. Needless to say, I'm glad to see it here again.
This was what I was told back in November by a source who would know. Needless to say, I'm glad to see it here again.
I just read an article about yesterday's SEC media day and it led me to check out the college football 2024 standings page on ESPN.com.
It's all so ridiculous and jarring.
16, 17 and 18 team conferences that are smashed together like a 4 year old playing with Play-Doh.
ACC | SEC | Big 12 | Big 10 | Pac 12 | American | MWC | CUSA | MAC | Sun Belt | Independent |
Boston College | Alabama | Baylor | Illinois | Oregon State | East Carolina | Air Force | FIU | Akron | Appalachian State | Notre Dame |
Clemson | Arkansas | BYU | Indiana | Washington State | Memphis | Boise State | Jacksonville State | Ball State | Arkansas State | UConn |
Duke | Auburn | Cincinnati | Iowa | Navy | Colorado State | Kennesaw State* | Bowling Green | Coastal Carolina | UMass | |
Florida State | Florida | Houston | Maryland | South Florida | Fresno State | Liberty | Buffalo | Georgia Southern | ||
Georgia Tech | Georgia | Iowa State | Michigan | Temple | Hawaii | Louisiana Tech | Central Michigan | Georgia State | ||
Louisville | Kentucky | Kansas | Michigan State | Tulane | Nevada | Middle Tennessee | Eastern Michigan | Louisiana | ||
Miami (FL) | LSU | Kansas State | Minnesota | Tulsa | New Mexico | New Mexico State | Kent State | Louisiana–Monroe | ||
NC State | Mississippi State | Oklahoma State | Nebraska | Charlotte | San Diego State | San Houston State | Miami (OH) | South Alabama | ||
North Carolina | Missouri | TCU | Northwestern | Florida Atlantic | San Jose State | UTEP | Northern Illinois | Texas State | ||
Pittsburgh | Ole Miss | Texas Tech | Ohio State | North Texas | UNLV | Western Kentucky | Ohio | Troy | ||
Syracuse | South Carolina | UCF | Penn State | Rice | Utah State | Toledo | Marshall | |||
Virginia | Tennessee | West Virginia | Purdue | UAB | Wyoming | Western Michigan | Old Dominion | |||
Virginia Tech | Texas A&M | Arizona* | Rutgers | UTSA | Southern Miss | |||||
Wake Forest | Vanderbilt | Arizona State* | Wisconsin | Army* | James Madison | |||||
California* | Oklahoma* | Colorado* | Washington* | |||||||
Stanford* | Texas* | Utah* | Oregon* | |||||||
SMU* | UCLA* | |||||||||
USC* | ||||||||||
I just read an article about yesterday's SEC media day and it led me to check out the college football 2024 standings page on ESPN.com.
It's all so ridiculous and jarring.
16, 17 and 18 team conferences that are smashed together like a 4 year old playing with Play-Doh.
This is why so many professional leagues are embracing sports betting after already embracing fantasy leagues. Remove the "fans" rooting interest from a specific team and it does not matter whether the local or favorite team is horrible. All that matters is whether the Bills beat the spread or Allen throws for 300 yards and four touchdowns.Yep. College sports are all about passion for the team you're connected to in some way, not simply wanting to watch a select few top teams battle. If the team I care about is completely irrelevant, I don't care about what happens in the rest of the sport. If it comes down to just a few elite teams that are essentially a minor league, why would I not just watch the NFL and leave my Saturdays open? College football at that point would be just as interesting to me as minor league baseball or g-league basketball.
Don't forget the NBA. Larry O'Brien made a conscious decision when free agency came in for the league to emphasize the individual stars over the teams. How many Kevin Durant jerseys are there, 4? 5? More?This is why so many professional leagues are embracing sports betting after already embracing fantasy leagues. Remove the "fans" rooting interest from a specific team and it does not matter whether the local or favorite team is horrible. All that matters is whether the Bills beat the spread or Allen throws for 300 yards and four touchdowns.
I just read an article about yesterday's SEC media day and it led me to check out the college football 2024 standings page on ESPN.com.
It's all so ridiculous and jarring.
16, 17 and 18 team conferences that are smashed together like a 4 year old playing with Play-Doh.
That works for some people. Never me. I watch sport for the sake of sport.This is why so many professional leagues are embracing sports betting after already embracing fantasy leagues. Remove the "fans" rooting interest from a specific team and it does not matter whether the local or favorite team is horrible. All that matters is whether the Bills beat the spread or Allen throws for 300 yards and four touchdowns.
I think this places the cart before the horse. FSU and Clemson must:if FSU and Clemson are really leaving no matter what when does the ACC/ESPN try and negotiate with them about an increased payout via the tv extension that occurs in 2025? if they are so valuable to the tv deal wouldn't ESPN propose this to keep the ACC and all that content in check. I feel like there's a money solution here if the SEC/BIG are truly out of the picture.
I do not disagree, but I wonder if we are becoming outliers. I even stopped playing fantasy football after realizing I cheered for an opposing team's touchdown against the Packers while I sat at Lambeau Field (my local and favorite team) because I had the wide receiver on my fantasy team.That works for some people. Never me. I watch sport for the sake of sport.
I wonder how much that stuff affects viewership. People can just check post game stats and scores if you're in it for the betting/fantasy football. I wouldn't waste my time watching whole games.I do not disagree, but I wonder if we are becoming outliers. I even stopped playing fantasy football after realizing I cheered for an opposing team's touchdown against the Packers while I sat at Lambeau Field (my local and favorite team) because I had the wide receiver on my fantasy team.
Stop it! Please Stop making sense.I think this places the cart before the horse. FSU and Clemson must:
1) win the right to leave the ACC in court (after all appeals and such)
2) prove they have the financial resources to pay the exit fee and the rights buy backs
3) must obtain BOT approvals
4) must actually provide notice that they will leave the ACC
Until that point, the matter is only a threat. Under the first point, FSU and Clemson face a steep uphill battle as several on here have notes and a few outsiders have delineated in detail. Until this hurdle -or should I say chasm - all other points are moot.
Under the second point, as it stands neither school has the resources at hand to leave immediately, making all other points moot.
Under the third point, the BOT have the fiduciary duty to make sure the overall deal is good for the school. Unless FSU and Clemson can get out for less than $100MM, it is not likely to be a sound financial decision upon a close scrutiny by financial minds.
ESPN should proceed as if FSU and Clemson are staying out in the ACC. Ignore clickbait generators and idiots who pretend to know:
- business
- contract law
- intellectual property law/entertainment law (GOR)
- negotiation tactics
Watching Hollywood is not like the real world. Fast deals can only be made by novices or when highly experienced professionals know the material and want to work with each other. FSU's AD is neither a highly experienced professional in this arena nor does he wish to work with anyone. He is attempting to force his will on 14 other schools with equally or higher skilled professionals.
Just my take.
I dunno. This seems like conference speak for dream job. That can say that until they don't. Right now it probably doesn't make sense, but how else does the BIG get a foothold in the SE?This was what I was told back in November by a source who would know. Needless to say, I'm glad to see it here again.
Maybe he could throw $1M Wildhack's way for advice from someone who, you know, knows something.I think this places the cart before the horse. FSU and Clemson must:
1) win the right to leave the ACC in court (after all appeals and such)
2) prove they have the financial resources to pay the exit fee and the rights buy backs
3) must obtain BOT approvals
4) must actually provide notice that they will leave the ACC
Until that point, the matter is only a threat. Under the first point, FSU and Clemson face a steep uphill battle as several on here have notes and a few outsiders have delineated in detail. Until this hurdle -or should I say chasm - all other points are moot.
Under the second point, as it stands neither school has the resources at hand to leave immediately, making all other points moot.
Under the third point, the BOT have the fiduciary duty to make sure the overall deal is good for the school. Unless FSU and Clemson can get out for less than $100MM, it is not likely to be a sound financial decision upon a close scrutiny by financial minds.
ESPN should proceed as if FSU and Clemson are staying out in the ACC. Ignore clickbait generators and idiots who pretend to know:
- business
- contract law
- intellectual property law/entertainment law (GOR)
- negotiation tactics
Watching Hollywood is not like the real world. Fast deals can only be made by novices or when highly experienced professionals know the material and want to work with each other. FSU's AD is neither a highly experienced professional in this arena nor does he wish to work with anyone. He is attempting to force his will on 14 other schools with equally or higher skilled professionals.
Just my take.
I like to bet and not watch. It's fun just playing a couple games and waking up to see if I won.This is why so many professional leagues are embracing sports betting after already embracing fantasy leagues. Remove the "fans" rooting interest from a specific team and it does not matter whether the local or favorite team is horrible. All that matters is whether the Bills beat the spread or Allen throws for 300 yards and four touchdowns.
Point 4 is covered in their filing. It states that if they prevail on the claims, the filing serves as notice that they officially are withdrawing as of so and so date.I think this places the cart before the horse. FSU and Clemson must:
1) win the right to leave the ACC in court (after all appeals and such)
2) prove they have the financial resources to pay the exit fee and the rights buy backs
3) must obtain BOT approvals
4) must actually provide notice that they will leave the ACC
Until that point, the matter is only a threat. Under the first point, FSU and Clemson face a steep uphill battle as several on here have notes and a few outsiders have delineated in detail. Until this hurdle -or should I say chasm - all other points are moot.
Under the second point, as it stands neither school has the resources at hand to leave immediately, making all other points moot.
Under the third point, the BOT have the fiduciary duty to make sure the overall deal is good for the school. Unless FSU and Clemson can get out for less than $100MM, it is not likely to be a sound financial decision upon a close scrutiny by financial minds.
ESPN should proceed as if FSU and Clemson are staying out in the ACC. Ignore clickbait generators and idiots who pretend to know:
- business
- contract law
- intellectual property law/entertainment law (GOR)
- negotiation tactics
Watching Hollywood is not like the real world. Fast deals can only be made by novices or when highly experienced professionals know the material and want to work with each other. FSU's AD is neither a highly experienced professional in this arena nor does he wish to work with anyone. He is attempting to force his will on 14 other schools with equally or higher skilled professionals.
Just my take.
There are a lot of reasons to not take FSU. They can still get into Florida and the South without the headache.I dunno. This seems like conference speak for dream job. That can say that until they don't. Right now it probably doesn't make sense, but how else does the BIG get a foothold in the SE?
The BIG would be silly not to want multiple schools in the region, and I don't think the BIG is silly.
But does a league as filthy rich as the BT need to gtke on th headache that FSU is? Nope.I dunno. This seems like conference speak for dream job. That can say that until they don't. Right now it probably doesn't make sense, but how else does the BIG get a foothold in the SE?
The BIG would be silly not to want multiple schools in the region, and I don't think the BIG is silly.
Like parts of your post, but as I have said. Syracuse, Miami, and Virginia Tech need to be the teams of the 1980's and 1990's.But does a league as filthy rich as the BT need to gtke on th headache that FSU is? Nope.
The BT getting multiple schools in the South should focus on coming to own VA and NC, and then adding AAU schools GT and Miami. To won VA and keep the DERC out, the BT would need to take non-AAU VT, and in NC to take non-AAU NCSU. That would open the door to take non-AAU Clemson . And if the BT wants a 2nd schools in FL, there AAU member South Florida, which has a BT size student body of about 50K.
All of that should nudge Disney to realize it is best off by paying the ACC what it is worth.
Saw a similar thing at a hockey game. Caps fan walking out of the arena after the Caps lose to the Rangers, "Well at least I had {Rangers defenseman who played really well} on my fantasy team."I do not disagree, but I wonder if we are becoming outliers. I even stopped playing fantasy football after realizing I cheered for an opposing team's touchdown against the Packers while I sat at Lambeau Field (my local and favorite team) because I had the wide receiver on my fantasy team.
That works for some people. Never me. I watch sport for the sake of sport.
The B1G and SEC will wait until the GOR is up. Even UT and OU had to figure their own way before the SEC would let them in. Both were going to wait out the GOR and then move. UCLA and USC waited out the GOR.I dunno. This seems like conference speak for dream job. That can say that until they don't. Right now it probably doesn't make sense, but how else does the BIG get a foothold in the SE?
The BIG would be silly not to want multiple schools in the region, and I don't think the BIG is silly.