EnviroSciGuy
Resident woody plant obsessive
- Joined
- Dec 17, 2012
- Messages
- 9,238
- Like
- 34,995
As a biology PhD I'm all for increasing investments in the STEM fields, as that is one of the best ways to keep the research $ coming in to SU. I do think there should be some modicum of balance though, and the value of the humanities should not be discounted.Michele Wheatly’s proposed STEM focus divides SU faculty
So I think this sheds a little light on some of the challenges that the administration faces with regard to spending. The humanities faculty seem to see a problem with spending anywhere but on them. I have been saying for some time that the school is headed in the direction of STEM and research in part to raise the academic profile and in part to raise the potential income through new programs, papers, grants, and patents. Michele Wheatly's hiring was a sign that was clearly pointing in that direction ( Michele Wheatly's push for STEM strategy follows trend of her career ) and the new CFO hire is along the same path. Syverud himself is a symbol of this direction. The rhetoric in the above article is some of why we are having a problem with AD spending on things like the Dome. I see the other side too, but they seem to be becoming more a roadblock than facilitators and protectors of the academics.
I'll also say that I met Michele Wheatly here at WVU at a research experience for undergrads event before Gee canned her. It was a very...unusual...experience and would probably make the skin crawl on many of the posters here.