Just to be clear, a draw doesn't guarantee anything, but some teams get favorable draws, and some teams get unfavorable ones. On the surface, I think ours is favorable.
First round-Montana-
We get the 13 seed with clearly the weakest profile of the group. Looking at Kenpom, only 7 teams rank lower than Montana. 6 are 16 seeds, and 1 is a 15. This team is rated lower than 3 15 seeds and all the 14 seeds.
According to the BPI this team is one slot higher than 15 seed FGCU, and is rated lower than 14 seed Northwestern St.
According to Vegas, the only other games with lines equal to or higher than ours are the 1-16 games, the 2-15 games, and one 3-14 game. Marq is less than a 5 point favorite over their 14 seed.
On paper, this is all very good. What we do with it is a whole other story, but you couldn't ask for a better opponent.
Likelier 2nd Round- UNLV-
According to Kenpom, the other 3 5 seeds are rated 9th (wisky- of course), 20th (Okla St), and 21st (VCU). UNLV is rated 36th. That's behind 3 11 seeds, a 12 seed, and right ahead of a 10 seed.
According to the BPI, they are also the lowest rated 5 seed. Though by not nearly as significant a margin as on Kenpom.
And let's be honest, though they will probably win their 1st round game, playing Cal in San Jose is not a good draw. It's a rematch, so the opponent is already familiar with them, and it's as much of a home game for Cal as anyone can get in an NCAA tourney.
Later Rounds-
Should we get there, I love that our draw is DC. Which, as any Gtown marketing rep can tell you, is full of SU fans. Sure IU is no joke, and it will be an exceedingly tough game, should it happen, but I'd rather play a tough opponent in a friendly environment, as opposed to say, IU in Indy, or Ville in Indy.
All in all, the committee did very good by us. What we do with it is a whole other story, but a very nice path has been laid out in front of us.
First round-Montana-
We get the 13 seed with clearly the weakest profile of the group. Looking at Kenpom, only 7 teams rank lower than Montana. 6 are 16 seeds, and 1 is a 15. This team is rated lower than 3 15 seeds and all the 14 seeds.
According to the BPI this team is one slot higher than 15 seed FGCU, and is rated lower than 14 seed Northwestern St.
According to Vegas, the only other games with lines equal to or higher than ours are the 1-16 games, the 2-15 games, and one 3-14 game. Marq is less than a 5 point favorite over their 14 seed.
On paper, this is all very good. What we do with it is a whole other story, but you couldn't ask for a better opponent.
Likelier 2nd Round- UNLV-
According to Kenpom, the other 3 5 seeds are rated 9th (wisky- of course), 20th (Okla St), and 21st (VCU). UNLV is rated 36th. That's behind 3 11 seeds, a 12 seed, and right ahead of a 10 seed.
According to the BPI, they are also the lowest rated 5 seed. Though by not nearly as significant a margin as on Kenpom.
And let's be honest, though they will probably win their 1st round game, playing Cal in San Jose is not a good draw. It's a rematch, so the opponent is already familiar with them, and it's as much of a home game for Cal as anyone can get in an NCAA tourney.
Later Rounds-
Should we get there, I love that our draw is DC. Which, as any Gtown marketing rep can tell you, is full of SU fans. Sure IU is no joke, and it will be an exceedingly tough game, should it happen, but I'd rather play a tough opponent in a friendly environment, as opposed to say, IU in Indy, or Ville in Indy.
All in all, the committee did very good by us. What we do with it is a whole other story, but a very nice path has been laid out in front of us.