JeremyCuse
Renowned lacrosse analyst
- Joined
- Aug 15, 2011
- Messages
- 41,714
- Like
- 54,416
Put in Gibbs or the walk on
means scoring 40% of the time (not counting shots back up) vs 60% (or less) possession lost. that is high efficiency and i dare say much higher than cuse's offense.For players the offense typically runs through (i.e. options 1-4), I agree.
But a second line mid who gets far fewer chances?
You’re comparing percentages without taking volume into consideration.means scoring 40% of the time (not counting shots back up) vs 60% (or less) possession lost. that is high efficiency and i dare say much higher than cuse's offense.
turned the ball over the last two possessions with no pressure whatsoever...View attachment 226023
You guys must’ve not watched the MD game on BTN+. Missed like 4 goals throughout it cause the camera operator couldn’t follow the play.Lacrosse TV should shut itself down after this debacle
You guys must’ve not watched the MD game on BTN+. Missed like 4 goals throughout it cause the camera operator couldn’t follow the play.
i know, we don't agree. but it's 40/60% in this case, and that is a phenomenal percentage if it's 20x a game or 2. imo.You’re comparing percentages without taking volume into consideration.
If nearly 2/3’s of a backup’s drives to the goal result in turnovers that ain’t good. If he were missing the goal but his teammates had backup, big deal.
I’m not trying to belabor the criticism. I would love to see him tear it up but that’s not been the case.
They did a much better job this summer at the world championships in IrelandLacrosse TV has to do better. Promoting the game and not doing a very good job.