Hofstra Gameday... | Page 9 | Syracusefan.com

Hofstra Gameday...

For players the offense typically runs through (i.e. options 1-4), I agree.

But a second line mid who gets far fewer chances?
means scoring 40% of the time (not counting shots back up) vs 60% (or less) possession lost. that is high efficiency and i dare say much higher than cuse's offense.
 
Final stats:

1678842278926.png


1678842355886.png
 
means scoring 40% of the time (not counting shots back up) vs 60% (or less) possession lost. that is high efficiency and i dare say much higher than cuse's offense.
You’re comparing percentages without taking volume into consideration.

If nearly 2/3’s of a backup’s drives to the goal result in turnovers that ain’t good. If he were missing the goal but his teammates had backup, big deal.

I’m not trying to belabor the criticism. I would love to see him tear it up but that’s not been the case.
 
You’re comparing percentages without taking volume into consideration.

If nearly 2/3’s of a backup’s drives to the goal result in turnovers that ain’t good. If he were missing the goal but his teammates had backup, big deal.

I’m not trying to belabor the criticism. I would love to see him tear it up but that’s not been the case.
i know, we don't agree. but it's 40/60% in this case, and that is a phenomenal percentage if it's 20x a game or 2. imo.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
174,865
Messages
5,299,012
Members
6,208
Latest member
meadowbr44k

Online statistics

Members online
376
Guests online
4,271
Total visitors
4,647


Top Bottom