jdubs30
Living Legend
- Joined
- Nov 26, 2011
- Messages
- 15,187
- Like
- 32,101
We aren't DukeWell when you have that many titles and final fours early round upsets are more forgivable.
We aren't DukeWell when you have that many titles and final fours early round upsets are more forgivable.
Exactly. Every team that goes to the FF has that knockdown, drag out type game; with how we looked vs. W. Michigan, if we escaped Dayton I would have been confident in us playing in Dallas.
We aren't Duke
I think we could have beat Stanford and had a good shot vs. Florida.Really? You think we could've scored against some of these other teams? The teams that are left are extremely good offensive teams. They can score on good defenses because of their personnel. We can't.
I struggle with the NCAA tourney by itself being the arbiter of success. It's just too random the 1-gamers. I mean are we really lesser because of one Keith smart jumper?
Really? You think we could've scored against some of these other teams? The teams that are left are extremely good offensive teams. They can score on good defenses because of their personnel. We can't.
SWC75 said:That's what I've always said that people who say that the NCAA tourney is "all that counts" are taking the wrong approach. It's kind of a crap shoot: each year you could play the tournament all over again and get a different result. You ahve to have multiple goals: win the conference regular seasons. win the conference tournament. Win 30 games. Get to the Final Four. All those things make a season "special. A national championship is historical. But it 's not the only goal or the only reason to have good memories of a season. It's just that when you see so many programs getting their 2nd, 3rd or 4th titles, the desire to get our second and the regret that we haven'tr already done so naturally increase.
That's what I've always said that people who say that the NCAA tourney is "all that counts" are taking the wrong approach. It's kind of a crap shoot: each year you could play the tournament all over again and get a different result. You ahve to have multiple goals: win the conference regular seasons. win the conference tournament. Win 30 games. Get to the Final Four. All those things make a season "special. A national championship is historical. But it 's not the only goal or the only reason to have good memories of a season.
It's just that when you see so many programs getting their 2nd, 3rd or 4th titles, the desire to get our second and the regret that we haven'tr already done so naturally increase.
We're not elite. 4 teams are elite: Duke, NC, Kansas and Kentucky. We're one of several near elite programs: Michigan State, UConn, Florida, Louisville etc. Other teams are ahead of us in the near elite category but I think we're comfortably in the top 10. Some feel we should be at the level of those top 4. We're not and may never be. I'm OK with that. We're not the Yankees of college basketball. If you simply can't handle us not being at that level, then you should change your allegiance to another team. You're likely to be happier and more satisfied doing that.
I think we would have beaten Stanford to get our 30th win and then lost to Florida, probably in a similar fashion to Dayton and be sad about that but have the feeling that we went about as far as we could go, which is a rare feeling this time of year.
iommi said:This is bs. Winning regular season titles and post-season title are nice, but ultimately no one gives a blank about that. All that matters in sports is winning it all. That's why Derek Jeter is an all/time great. He has five rings. No one brings up all the Yankees' AL East titles. Your post is designed to excuse Boeheim and his won Title. He has accomplished a lot but the fact that he has one ring DOES hurt his legacy.
LeBron could have won a lot of games in Cleveland but he came to Miami because?
And didn't JB say that Melo needed to find a team where he could win a title?
I agree; but it's kind of crazy to think if Keith Smart missed that shot, JB would be on a different level.This is bs. Winning regular season titles and post-season titles is nice, but ultimately no one gives a blank about that. All that matters in sports is winning it all. That's why Derek Jeter is an all-time great. He has five rings. No one brings up all the Yankees' AL East titles.
Your post is designed to excuse Boeheim and his one Title. He has accomplished a lot but the fact that he has one ring DOES hurt his legacy.
This is bs. Winning regular season titles and post-season title are nice, but ultimately no one gives a blank about that. All that matters in sports is winning it all. That's why Derek Jeter is an all/time great. He has five rings. No one brings up all the Yankees' AL East titles.
Your post is designed to excuse Boeheim and his one Title. He has accomplished a lot but the fact that he has one ring DOES hurt his legacy.
That's what I've always said that people who say that the NCAA tourney is "all that counts" are taking the wrong approach. It's kind of a crap shoot: each year you could play the tournament all over again and get a different result. You ahve to have multiple goals: win the conference regular seasons. win the conference tournament. Win 30 games. Get to the Final Four. All those things make a season "special. A national championship is historical. But it 's not the only goal or the only reason to have good memories of a season.
It's just that when you see so many programs getting their 2nd, 3rd or 4th titles, the desire to get our second and the regret that we haven't already done so naturally increase.
I agree; but it's kind of crazy to think if Keith Smart missed that shot, JB would be on a different level.
If you think that we would have beaten stanford, how do you feel that we went as far as we could go?
SWC75 said:Wow. I said in the post that we are naturally going to be dissatisfied with one title when these other schools have 2-3 and previously posted on the same subject. I never mentioned Boeheim. I simply said that if your happiness is based entirely on what happens in a single elimination tournament, happiness is going to be elusive. That's true for all schools and their fans. And if wining national championships is the only thing "anybody" cares about, then we've had one successful season in our history. Do you really want to say that?!?
Because we weren't as good as Florida. I think we were better than Dayton and Stanford.
Wow. I said in the post that we are naturally going to be dissatisfied with one title when these other schools have 2-3 and previously posted on the same subject. I never mentioned Boeheim. I simply said that if your happiness is based entirely on what happens in a single elimination tournament, happiness is going to be elusive. That's true for all schools and their fans. And if wining national championships is the only thing "anybody" cares about, then we've had one successful season in our history. Do you really want to say that?!?
or resume does not compare to duke in any way, shape, or form.Because the dukes of the world don't stumble early?
You said we are lesser because of our tourney stumbles. I said all teams have those, including Duke. I compared our stumbling early resumes only. Duke has a whole bunch of bumbles. If you're going to hold it against us, hold it against them. Kansas and Florida have them too. Be consistent.or resume does not compare to duke in any way, shape, or form.