SaltineWarrior
Scout Team
- Joined
- Aug 31, 2011
- Messages
- 416
- Like
- 572
This is the real issue. Where exactly do you draw the line in paying players? The top players on the top teams that generate a lot of the $? What about the role players on that team or top recruits that don’t dominate as projected? What about players at a mid major school or lower level team in a P5 team? What about athletes from all the other sports?Can't wait for the class action lawsuits demanding the same $100k for every woman's field hockey member. Going to be the end of collegiate sports.
The fact is football and basketball athletes get 100% of their education paid for whether they are a dominate player or just a regular player on their team. Win or lose, they get their education. What happens if the TV deals go south or the fans don’t come out and fill the stadiums one year? Will those same players accept that there is less money to share?
Full athletic tuition is rare for every other sport and the idea that college athletics can afford to pay all athletes is ridiculous. Do the revenues from football and basketball subsidize the rest of that school’s teams? Yes the do. But those same players have a great platform to prepare and even make a name for themselves in college and are able to get a full ride in college. As anyone who ha recently paid, currently paying or about to pay for college tuition, that is a huge benefit.