manleyzoo
2nd String
- Joined
- Aug 27, 2011
- Messages
- 732
- Like
- 1,292
How is it that the NCAA has skated so far on this investigation? They were right out of the gate to hypocritically denounce the whole thing when they're the puppet master. Haven't they patted themselves on the back for years about protecting the student athlete? Seems to me that if the whole house of cards falls they should be toppled too. Blaming the players, coaches and even the agents misses the point: It is the NCAA which coined the self-serving term student athlete back in the 50s to make certain they had no responsibility to the players and could not be held accountable in the courts. So, of course, now with big money on the table, it makes perfect sense that everyone is going to have their hand out to be paid. As well they should.
Here's why: Walter Byers, who basically invented the modern NCAA in the 50s, confessed in his memoir published in 1995 that he had built a monster: "The term student-athlete was deliberately ambiguous. College players were not students at play (which might understate their athletic obligations), nor were they just athletes in college (which might imply they were professionals). That they were high-performance athletes meant they could be forgiven for not meeting the academic standards of their peers; that they were students meant they did not have to be compensated, ever, for anything more than the cost of their studies. Student-athlete became the NCAA’s signature term, repeated constantly in and out of courtrooms.
So when you're not really a student and you're prohibited from making money on your services and the NCAA considers you some kind of 'other,' doesn't it stand to reason that they're the root problem with players, coaches, agents and the system?
Here's why: Walter Byers, who basically invented the modern NCAA in the 50s, confessed in his memoir published in 1995 that he had built a monster: "The term student-athlete was deliberately ambiguous. College players were not students at play (which might understate their athletic obligations), nor were they just athletes in college (which might imply they were professionals). That they were high-performance athletes meant they could be forgiven for not meeting the academic standards of their peers; that they were students meant they did not have to be compensated, ever, for anything more than the cost of their studies. Student-athlete became the NCAA’s signature term, repeated constantly in and out of courtrooms.
So when you're not really a student and you're prohibited from making money on your services and the NCAA considers you some kind of 'other,' doesn't it stand to reason that they're the root problem with players, coaches, agents and the system?