David321
All American
- Joined
- May 19, 2021
- Messages
- 6,143
- Like
- 15,653
According to Fran Brown, yes.Are we sure Kyle would want to stay? I’m sure his ultimate goal is to get into the league and waiting a year probably won’t help his chances.
According to Fran Brown, yes.Are we sure Kyle would want to stay? I’m sure his ultimate goal is to get into the league and waiting a year probably won’t help his chances.
Not to mention, and somebody correct me if I’m wrong, an undrafted free agent, or at best where they are talking about him from a 3rd to 6th round pick, in this day and age, he could actually make more $ next year by staying here as I’m hearing he could make dramatically more than he made last year should he return.He’s seen as a lower rd pick. Another year successful year would improve his position. He can probably get about the same amount as a lower rd pick staying.
From what I’ve heard Kyle has said if he can, he will definitely be back next year at Cuse. This part is my opinion ——> if I had to guess I’d say if he comes back whatever he gets in NIL would be double next season.Are we sure Kyle would want to stay? I’m sure his ultimate goal is to get into the league and waiting a year probably won’t help his chances.
3. The corrupt NCAA has a vendetta against Syracuse1. The NCAA rules do not make sense
2. They don’t deviate from their rules
I honestly would beg to differ. Right now his stock is up slightly but he is still a day 3-UDFA on most draft boards. It is already solidified who the top guys in this years class are and even if he kills the bowl game and draft workouts that really isn’t going to change. Next year I think breeds a ton more opportunity for him. Right now the top prospect for next year is Arch Manning and he has barely even played college ball. After that it’s a lot of guys who are inexperienced or not fully proven. If Kyle came back and had a similar season to this year with a much tougher schedule and far more national attention he could easily work his way into a Day 2 selection if higher.
I’d say Pearl. Pearl elevated the program as McCord is doing and he was a PG, similar leadership position as QB.With the incredible success Kyle has had this year, who is his comp from the basketball side in terms of impact on the program.
a) Pearl
b) Melo
c) DC
Agreed but that kid is getting drafted. It might not be round 1 or 2. He will prolly go later in the cycle, hopefully plucked by a team that has there sh*% together. No lofty expectations and is ALLOWED to develop into a true nfl qb. Then years later the commenters will go . Ohhhh man how did so many teams miss on this kid!?!? To be fair as the data has shown, this is typically the best route anyways.One good thing about being an undrafted QB he can pick from his suiters and not be forced to play in a horrible system a lot of QB's drafted are put in.
Agreed but that kid is getting drafted. It might not be round 1 or 2. He will prolly go later in the cycle, hopefully plucked by a team that has there sh*% together. No lofty expectations and is ALLOWED to develop into a true nfl qb. Then years later the commenters will go . Ohhhh man how did so many teams miss on this kid!?!? To be fair as the data has shown, this is typically the best route anyways.
how many games did McCord win us? (above replacement)
3? 4?
That’s the piece I was concerned with. If they signed off and have acknowledged their fault, then the case has a MUCH higher probability of going our way.here is what i will say... and i have mocked ryan day all year.
but from what i have heard was the first battle won was ohio state signing off on our waiver. and they (aka ryan day) did.
me thinks that is why Fran reiterated the "heck i owe him a case of champagne" a couple of weeks ago.
it now sits with NCAA. And Mccord still has to decide. But OSU did everyone a favor by giving the OK to start this.
Wallace.With the incredible success Kyle has had this year, who is his comp from the basketball side in terms of impact on the program.
a) Pearl
b) Melo
c) DC
3. SU hardly ever gets a break from the NCAA.1. The NCAA rules do not make sense
2. They don’t deviate from their rules
Well, there is little doubt that we have indeed asked for a waiver. As I said earlier, someone that we all know was told by someone at the University that they expect to win. That someone who said that was not Fran Brown. I have no reason to think that is correct and could think of no rational where it could be. But damn, someone here did just make a pretty good case for a waiver. I still don't believe it. But it is interesting.
I’d say Pearl. Pearl elevated the program as McCord is doing and he was a PG, similar leadership position as QB
Hard to come up with an equivalent. Tony Bruin was a huge recruit for Boeheim. So getting Pearl--an even bigger recruit--was hardly out of nowhere. Pearl put us on a big stage, but the stage was already set so to speak. And Pearl never really led us far in the Big Dance. For fun... watch a bit of Syracuse/Houston when the latter had a few NBA Hall of Famers, but we won: One of Bruin's best games. Anyway, I guess we could say Melo because he elevated the program to a new level.Wallace.
I'll say Wes Johnson. McCord isn't on Melo's level, but I think Wes (a fantastic one-year player for us) is an apt comparison. He's a guy who was very good before coming to SU and then became great at SU.With the incredible success Kyle has had this year, who is his comp from the basketball side in terms of impact on the program.
a) Pearl
b) Melo
c) DC
the original rule was more along the lines you couldnt play after game 4. the 30% rule was for bball. But the rule has been tweaked a few times over the years.The original rule was that if you got injured and you only played 30% of the games (and all the games were in the first half of the season), you were eligible to apply for a redshirt.
30% of 12 games = 3.6 games, rounded up to 4.
The rule was changed during Covid to allow redshirting for everyone who only played 4 games.
That's where the 4 game amount came from.
I guess but it isn't me.Are you someone that we all know?
BTW, I dare anyone to watch 3 minutes of the 1987 game. If you can do that and stop... you are better than me. I am approaching halftime...Hard to come up with an equivalent. Tony Bruin was a huge recruit for Boeheim. So getting Pearl--an even bigger recruit--was hardly out of nowhere. Pearl put us on a big stage, but the stage was already set so to speak. And Pearl never really led us far in the Big Dance. For fun... watch a bit of Syracuse/Houston when the latter had a few NBA Hall of Famers, but we won: One of Bruin's best games. Anyway, I guess we could say Melo because he elevated the program to a new level.
From a football side... perhaps you could say Tim Green? Whereas we tended to lose recruiting battles to Penn State, it was Green deciding to stay home that gave the program momentum again. Green was gone by 1987, but the fruits were paying off that season. If you can spare some time... watch this 1987 game against Penn State. It becomes pretty clear that this was the best team Syracuse has had in my life time. No real weakness. October 17, 1987 - #10 Penn State @ #13 Syracuse
Wallace.