i think you are being generous. More like Barry vs Eddie George.I think Allen is a chain mover and Tucker is a HR hitter. It’s like comparing Barry Sanders vs Emmit Smith.
Emmitt got 3 yards ever play, Barry took a ton of negative plays, but then would go 75 yards for a score.
Allen is the best receiver I’ve seen out of the backfield in a long time.
It’s close, but I’m taking Allen.
And Tucker also had a QB who ran for almost 800 yards who had to be accounted for on every play his sophomore year.I think Tucker’s less outstanding final season (seemingly due to injury) has shaped people’s perceptions of his career. The idea of adding a home run threat to this offense blows my mind. I am not sure if it would make up for what is lost in blocking and receiving, but I think it might.
Talent level sure. I was talking general style/ results..
i think you are being generous. More like Barry vs Eddie George.
I am as well. Smith was more than a 3 yard guy. That is Eddie George.Talent level sure. I was talking general style/ results.
Holy shot dude relax. I’m sorry I insulted your best friend. I’m saying generally Emmitt was a consistent chain mover. The kinda guy you can depend on at least getting 3 yards. Did he break off bigger ones…absolutely- he was a great back. He rarely went backward.I am as well. Smith was more than a 3 yard guy. That is Eddie George.
That doesn’t describe LQA does it? Sorry I have a problem with people making LQA to be something he is not. It is really weird.Holy shot dude relax. I’m sorry I insulted your best friend. I’m saying generally Emmitt was a consistent chain mover. The kinda guy you can depend on at least getting 3 yards. Did he break off bigger ones…absolutely- he was a great back. He rarely went backward.
Chilax.
I just went back and watched tuckers highlights. I want my vote back. lolAs much as I like Allen, there is a LOT of recency bias going on in this thread.
We're two days after LQA helped win our best bowl in a few years and it's weird that people post some positive things about him? Pardon me if I find it weirder to respond negatively to positive posts about him while there's still an afterglow from the game where he scored twice and ran for over 100 yards. What about him didn't and / or don't you like?That doesn’t describe LQA does it? Sorry I have a problem with people making LQA to be something he is not. It is really weird.
I would say Tucker showed a lot of heart not shutting it down halfway through the season. By playing hurt he may have actually hurt his draft stock.My super unknowledgeable perception is that Allen had more heart, drive and passion and is a more well rounded back. Tucker has better vision, speed and shiftiness and thus was a better runner of the ball but he also either due to injury, health or otherwise began taking A LOT of business decision and his last year here was simply a let down because of how capable we knew he was.
It's really a toss up but as such I will take the team guy in a close race so Allen.
Eddie George is an NFL great. If that is negative not sure what to say.We're two days after LQA helped win our best bowl in a few years and it's weird that people post some positive things about him? Pardon me if I find it weirder to respond negatively to positive posts about him while there's still an afterglow from the game where he scored twice and ran for over 100 yards. What about him didn't and / or don't you like?
Cherie, it’s just light hearted sports chatter. They’re both great football players. The reason I asked is because I personally couldn’t decide between the two. As always, I appreciate your kind sentiment.Heard Tucker was the team’s hardest worker. I don’t think work ethic was an issue for either of them. Both were great for us and their teams. I don’t understand the original question anyways pitting them in a hypothetical competition against the other anyways. We just have been so fortunate to have had both.
What's sad is that some people feel like they need to make one guy sound bad to say the other is good or that if a weakness is constructively pointed out about "your" guy people act like he's being insulted.Heard Tucker was the team’s hardest worker. I don’t think work ethic was an issue for either of them. Both were great for us and their teams. I don’t understand the original question anyways pitting them in a hypothetical competition against the other anyways. We just have been so fortunate to have had both.
The same thing kind of happened in the McCord threads comparing him to previous QBs.What's sad is that some people feel like they need to make one guy sound bad to say the other is good or that if a weakness is constructively pointed out about "your" guy people act like he's being insulted.
I didn’t mean to sound harsh but I guess to evaluate them to prefer one player over another, you have to judge their respective value which always seems to bring out negativity and competitive views. I too appreciated both who have made their respective teams better using their talents in different ways in different times. Sorry, I didn’t mean to sound judgemental myself.Cherie, it’s just light hearted sports chatter. They’re both great football players. The reason I asked is because I personally couldn’t decide between the two. As always, I appreciate your kind sentiment.
I'm a little confused by this thread. I thought there was a consensus that Tucker was an excellent receiving back, and the knock on him was that he didn't have 4th gear speed.Can we have LQA with Tuckers speed? That's really the crux of this conversation. LQA is a much more complete player, and Tucker more athletically gifted. It's a tough comparison and comes down to preference.
LQA is the toughest runner we've had since Delone Carter.