TexanMark
Tailgate Guru
- Joined
- Aug 15, 2011
- Messages
- 25,267
- Like
- 47,574
Yes if they lose to Pitt they are toast...I just think they won't.Agree 100%--very astute post, Marsh.
Yes if they lose to Pitt they are toast...I just think they won't.Agree 100%--very astute post, Marsh.
Then you might as well throw Boatright in there too. He was probably a 2-and-done player anyway, but he may decide to leave too. And you're probably right about Lamb and Drummond, but it doesn't mean they are going to flourish in the pro's. Drummond has loads of potential, for sure, but if he plays like a zombie, how long does he stick? Lamb is the same way. Has a ton of potential, but he's rail thin and not the greatest shooter. Both will need a lot of work at the next level to be long term players. If UConn doesn't get cleared to play in the tourney next season, they probably will leave. I just don't think that making a long term career decision based on whether or not you play in the dance is smart. They will still get a ton of exposure at UConn next season.
And don't count Calhoun out. He has kept most of his star players for more than one season. I think he's the biggest key to how next year's team looks.
Doesn't matter if they flourish or not. When you're pretty much a guaranteed top 10 pick (Lamb) and a guaranteed top 3 pick (AD), you go. NBA takes chance on ability. And I'm a believer that you can absolute improve yourself at the next level, and while it might take you 3 or 4 years, you can still be an effective player even if you started slow.Then you might as well throw Boatright in there too. He was probably a 2-and-done player anyway, but he may decide to leave too. And you're probably right about Lamb and Drummond, but it doesn't mean they are going to flourish in the pro's. Drummond has loads of potential, for sure, but if he plays like a zombie, how long does he stick? Lamb is the same way. Has a ton of potential, but he's rail thin and not the greatest shooter. Both will need a lot of work at the next level to be long term players. If UConn doesn't get cleared to play in the tourney next season, they probably will leave. I just don't think that making a long term career decision based on whether or not you play in the dance is smart. They will still get a ton of exposure at UConn next season.
And don't count Calhoun out. He has kept most of his star players for more than one season. I think he's the biggest key to how next year's team looks.
Doesn't matter if they flourish or not. When you're pretty much a guaranteed top 10 pick (Lamb) and a guaranteed top 3 pick (AD), you go. NBA takes chance on ability. And I'm a believer that you can absolute improve yourself at the next level, and while it might take you 3 or 4 years, you can still be an effective player even if you started slow.
What if they come back and struggle even more next year and their stock plummets? What if they have a nagging injury and aren't healthy all year? This risks outweigh the money.
I like Boatright honestly, but he has to get a lot bigger and hasn't shown enough to be close to a 1st round pick yet, it took Kemba 3 years, it'll take Ryan at least that.
Calhoun is not notorious for taking 1-and-done guys, AD was a special case; he was arguably the biggest recruit in the programs history and was from CT. Most of his NBA players didn't come in very highly established, he made them into that.
I'll bet you $1,000 that doesn't happen. Joyce knows where to find me and that I'm good for it.
I think UConn finds a way in. Even Lunardi after tonight's loss still has them in and not even as one of the last 4 in. I bet they make it and are placed in the East. Watch us play them again in the East Regional in Boston.
Considering their former AD got fired I don't see that helping them. He has to leave the room anyway when UConn comes up.I don't see it unless they beat Pitt and then win at least two BET games. They are the defending champs and their former AD is the Selection Committee Chairman. That's the good news. But their resume stinks. RPI has them with the most difficult schedule in the country. That is hilarious. Take a gander at the schedule that Duke or Michigan State played. Not even close. Every time the Huskies lose they fall two spots in the RPI. Maybe after ten more losses they'd fall out of the top 50. It is a testament to the power of that goofy index that people actually think they merit consideration.
Considering their former AD got fired I don't see that helping them. He has to leave the room anyway when UConn comes up.
Good thing for that, or you'd be in Notre Dame territory (actually, worse). Using 6 game stretch over a 3 week period to justify 53 others over a 9 month period though...It's still a nat champ sandwich, and it's delicious.
Considering their former AD got fired I don't see that helping them. He has to leave the room anyway when UConn comes up.
No team that can't win at least half of its conference games belongs in the Big Dance. That includes sub-.500 teams that win their conference tourney. UCONN has earned its way into the NIT this year. Let's hope they don't find lightning in the proverbial bottle two years in a row.
UConn does have the 6th best SOS out of conference and their RPI is somewhere around 100.I don't see it unless they beat Pitt and then win at least two BET games. They are the defending champs and their former AD is the Selection Committee Chairman. That's the good news. But their resume stinks. RPI has them with the most difficult schedule in the country. That is hilarious. Take a gander at the schedule that Duke or Michigan State played. Not even close. Every time the Huskies lose they fall two spots in the RPI. Maybe after ten more losses they'd fall out of the top 50. It is a testament to the power of that goofy index that people actually think they merit consideration.
Actually I read (and posted the link) that he has to leave the room whenever any BE school is discussed since he is now employed by the BE.Considering their former AD got fired I don't see that helping them. He has to leave the room anyway when UConn comes up.
UConn does have the 6th best SOS out of conference and their RPI is somewhere around 100.
I was referring to just Big East play over the last 3 years (hence the 9 months).They won 31 games last year man.
Good thing for that, or you'd be in Notre Dame territory (actually, worse). Using 6 game stretch over a 3 week period to justify 53 others over a 9 month period though...
Under .500 in-conference, less than 20 wins, lost 9 out of last 12. Do we really need to go on?UConn has the 8th best SOS out of conference and their RPI is 30. Not sure where you get your #s. Their real rpi should be somewhere between the 30 and 100.
Under .500 in-conference, less than 20 wins, lost 9 out of last 12. Do we really need to go on?
The reason why i think uconn is in trouble is because teams like gonzaga...wichita st...murray st...these teams had better win their conference tourneys. If these teams dont then i would be in panic mode come selection sunday. Throw in creighton as well.
Sent from my DROID BIONIC using Tapatalk
There are are some others.
The A-10 is pretty balanced, and a St.Joes, Dayton, Lasalle or UMass can win that thing.
PAC-10 can get three bids if the right team wins their tourney
CUSA - Southern Miss and Memphis are in, but there some solid teams in that conference like Marshall, Central Florida, Tulsa that can possibly win that tourney.
Until tourney week, I always view the last 4 in, as likely out due to bubble busters.