sdhall01
2022 Cali Award Winner (Sacks) 4 lifetime!
- Joined
- Aug 3, 2015
- Messages
- 5,094
- Like
- 8,690
So, a bunch of guys who mostly walked into programs that were already good, an old defensive coach and a guy who might be good. Even if all of those were true, you would consider Brohm at 6? right? None of those other coaches had schools attempting to poach them. Purdue paid what was necessary to keep the guy they wanted. A guy who has done incredibly well as an OC and HC for the last 10 years. He's 47. Purdue keeping him now means they could have him for another 20 years. It's worth the investment
Again, we can agree to disagree, but it's not "maybe if this is true." It's true. The coach that "might be good" took a one win UCF team and got it an—albeit feebly—contested national championship. Maybe Purdue will have him for 20 years; maybe not. Regardless, they overpaid for him this year.