Luke Carney

[OttoinGrotto]

I just don't think Fran/Nixon are ready to change things in order to win. We need to run less plays not speed things up. I believe that we are 5th Nationally in plays per FBS game. That does not make sense going forward.

We probably should be under 70 plays, under 40 passes, and about 30 rushes. It doesn't matter who is QB, we aren't winning throwing it 50 times a game. Especially if JRS is out.

Eh, it's really hard to change number of plays the right way.

You can reduce plays per game by having more three and outs (I am not going to phrase it threes and out, nerds). But that's not really conducive to winning.

 

[CbusCuse]

I just don't think Fran/Nixon are ready to change things in order to win. We need to run less plays not speed things up. I believe that we are 5th Nationally in plays per FBS game. That does not make sense going forward.

We probably should be under 70 plays, under 40 passes, and about 30 rushes. It doesn't matter who is QB, we aren't winning throwing it 50 times a game. Especially if JRS is out.

Interesting that we are that high on plays. I'd guess because we pass a lot and get a lot of incompletions stopping the clock. And then our defense has given up a fair share of large chunk plays and scores giving us the ball back for more plays.

But I don't necessarily agree with the thought of we need to run it a lot to be successful. I don't think the run game is our strong suit. We should work on improving it but don't call more of it if we aren't good at it. We have seen in our offensive system, we can pass a lot and be successful. Now I'm not very confident Ricky is gonna make us successful in this plan, but Carney may as Angeli was starting to be as well. I don’t think we have a great rushing offense right now. Do what we do best a bit more than the other, run or pass, and let the other compliment.

 

[XC Cuse]

I never saw Carney throw to any receiver other then his locked on primary. Just saying

At least with the threat of a run that gives you two options every play. Rickie is the same without the running threat

 

[HRE Otto IV]

Interesting that we are that high on plays. I'd guess because we pass a lot and get a lot of incompletions stopping the clock. And then our defense has given up a fair share of large chunk plays and scores giving us the ball back for more plays.

But I don't necessarily agree with the thought of we need to run it a lot to be successful. I don't think the run game is our strong suit. We should work on improving it but don't call more of it if we aren't good at it. We have seen in our offensive system, we can pass a lot and be successful. Now I'm not very confident Ricky is gonna make us successful in this plan but Carney may. I don’t think we have a great rushing offense right now. Do what we do best a little bit more, run or pass, and let the other compliment.

We pass a lot and get a lot of incompletions stopping the clock. And then our defense has given up a fair share of large chunk plays and scores giving us the ball back for more plays.

Just slowing the pace a little will help both our O and our D.

I am not suggest 3 yards and a cloud of dust. If we called runs 5 more times a game while calling passes 10 less times per game, we would still be around a 55-45 split of pass to run. It isn't run heavy but balanced.

 

[CbusCuse]

I never saw Carney throw to any receiver other then his locked on primary. Just saying

I don't think thats true. Watch his senior highlights again. I just did with that with this in mind and no complaints here from me on that subject. He started looking one way often and then looked the other. Possible that is still his #1 read though. I'd bet a lot he has better vision of receivers than Rickie. If they are open throw it to the #1. There were some where the opponent had decent coverage on them but he still made the throw and completed it by putting it in the right spot, where only his receivers can get it. He is decisive because he has confidence in his passing abilities and he is accurate.

I watch his film and i don't see any weakness or any things that made me question can he do this or that. He has very efficient motions. Love his throwing motion, foot work, timing, accuracy, confidence in his throws and decisions. Moves in the pocket well, can feel and evade pressure. Can make plays with his feet. Has good arm strength. Seems to have everything you want other than be 2" taller and 20 lbs heavier. But his size is plenty sufficient. From his interviews he seems smart and confident. To me the risk on him not panning out is much lower than any QB we have brought in, as far as i can remember.

Will he be ready to be productive as a true freshman though? We may see. It comes down to the mental side of it and his confidence in the offensive play book and just his confidence in himself moving up a level. Does he have that swagger and confidence as a true frosh? Does he feel like he can gain the respect of his team and be a leader of these men as a true frosh? is he mature enough for that? I'd guess he is and he will look pretty solid when he gets his opportunity.

 

[CbusCuse]

Just slowing the pace a little will help both our O and our D.

I am not suggest 3 yards and a cloud of dust. If we called runs 5 more times a game while calling passes 10 less times per game, we would still be around a 55-45 split of pass to run. It isn't run heavy but balanced.

I agree on slowing the pace if we are not being efficient. If we get an incomplete or stuffed on a run slow it down. But if you get a first down and want to go fast and speed it up that makes sense to me. Assuming you think that is an advantage to being more successful on the next play.

But if the offense is sputtering, yeah lets slow it down a bit.

 

[Archbold44]

I don't think thats true. Watch his senior highlights again. I just did with that in mind and no complaints here from me on that subject. He started looking one way often and then looked the other. Possible that is still his #1 read though. I'd bet a lot he has better vision of receivers than Rickie. If they are open throw it to the #1. There were some where the opponent had decent coverage on them but he still made the throw and completed it by putting it in the right spot, where only his receivers can get it. He is decisive because he has confidence in his passing abilities and he is accurate.

I watch his film and i don't see any weakness or any things that may me question can he do this or that. He has very efficient motions. Love his throwing motion, foot work, timing, accuracy, confidence in his throws and decisions. Moves in the pocket well, can feel and evade pressure. Can make plays with his feet. Has good arm strength. Seems to have everything you want other than be 2" taller and 20 lbs heavier. But his size is plenty sufficient. From his interviews he seems smart and confident. To me the risk on him not panning out is much lower than any QB we have brought in, as far as i can remember.

Will he be ready to be productive as a true freshman though? We may see. It comes down to the mental side of it and his confidence in the offensive play book and just his confidence in himself moving up a level. Does he have that swagger and confidence as a true frosh? Does he feel like he can gain the respect of his team and be a leader of these men as a true frosh? is he mature enough for that? I'd guess he is and he will look pretty solid when he gets his opportunity.

It is a highlight tape though. Not seeing the interceptions, incomplete passes, or sacks. Let's see some whole game tapes for Carney.

Collins has had a few nice passes. Mix in a few nice runs and you can start to put together his highlight tape. Would be kind of misleading without all the other bad plays. Edit: One Exists:

 

[OttoinGrotto]

It is a highlight tape though. Not seeing the interceptions, incomplete passes, or sacks. Let's see some whole game tapes for Carney.

Collins has had a few nice passes. Mix in a few nice runs and you can start to put together his highlight tape. Would be kind of misleading without all the other bad plays. Edit: One Exists:

Although Carney's career stats suggest he made predominantly good plays.

Whereas Collins' season stats suggest... not so much.

 

[CbusCuse]

It is a highlight tape though. Not seeing the interceptions, incomplete passes, or sacks. Let's see some whole game tapes for Carney.

Collins has had a few nice passes. Mix in a few nice runs and you can start to put together his highlight tape. Would be kind of misleading without all the other bad plays. Edit: One Exists:

Understand your point Archbold44. It is highlights only. But that is pretty much true for any recruit film.

Although Carney's career stats suggest he made predominantly good plays.

Whereas Collins' season stats suggest... not so much.

Exactly. There is a lot more data to back-up his efficiency. 4 years worth of excellent numbers.

 

[UnknownOrange]

I think people take fran's 'loyalty' remarks as he's a little too locked in on Rickie, or was locked in on Steve

Fran is loyal, but he's also no dummy. He wants to win football games. If Luke Carney gives him a better chance to win than Rickie, he's going to play Luke.

The fact that we haven't seen Luke should tell you he's not ready. Yeah he has a great HS track record, but this is D1 Football. Rickie is likely further along and has a better grasp on our playbook than Luke does. That doesn't mean I love what I see from Rickie... but the back up QB is at their most popular when the starter underperforms

How many of us called for Rickie when Angeli struggled against UConn? Would you make those same comments with hindsight?

I think Luke has the tools to be a great QB.. but that doesn't mean he's our best option right now

Establish the run, design quick and winnable throws, don't turn the ball over, and prevent redzone trips. There's a lot we can improve on no matter who the QB is, that will make their life easier

I say all this as someone who wanted to see Luke during the Duke and SMU games.

 

[Archbold44]

I think people take fran's 'loyalty' remarks as he's a little too locked in on Rickie, or was locked in on Steve

Fran is loyal, but he's also no dummy. He wants to win football games. If Luke Carney gives him a better chance to win than Rickie, he's going to play Luke.

The fact that we haven't seen Luke should tell you he's not ready. Yeah he has a great HS track record, but this is D1 Football. Rickie is likely further along and has a better grasp on our playbook than Luke does. That doesn't mean I love what I see from Rickie... but the back up QB is at their most popular when the starter underperforms

How many of us called for Rickie when Angeli struggled against UConn? Would you make those same comments with hindsight?

I think Luke has the tools to be a great QB.. but that doesn't mean he's our best option right now

Establish the run, design quick and winnable throws, don't turn the ball over, and prevent redzone trips. There's a lot we can improve on no matter who the QB is, that will make their life easier

I say all this as someone who wanted to see Luke during the Duke and SMU games.

If we are sticking with Rickie, I want to see more QB runs and WR runs and RBs off tackle... and less of just runs between the guards. Given that he cannot pass like Steve, we need to do different things. Who, other than Rickie, can come in and throw a pass as a RB, TE, or WR?

This is the game to leave it all on the table. If we cannot beat Pitt, I do not see us upsetting Ga Tech, Miami, or ND (all three in the playoff discussion). And, even if we do beat Pitt in anything other than a sheer blowout where some QB plays out of this world, it is STILL not likely. No sense not going pretty deep into the playbook.

 

[GoSU96]

It is a highlight tape though. Not seeing the interceptions, incomplete passes, or sacks. Let's see some whole game tapes for Carney.

Collins has had a few nice passes. Mix in a few nice runs and you can start to put together his highlight tape. Would be kind of misleading without all the other bad plays. Edit: One Exists:

What that shows is that he has the capability, but is highly inefficient. 300 plus total yds from your qb should generate more than 18 pts.

To win games they need twice as many pts out of those yds.

 

[HRE Otto IV]

I think people take fran's 'loyalty' remarks as he's a little too locked in on Rickie, or was locked in on Steve

Fran is loyal, but he's also no dummy. He wants to win football games. If Luke Carney gives him a better chance to win than Rickie, he's going to play Luke.

The fact that we haven't seen Luke should tell you he's not ready. Yeah he has a great HS track record, but this is D1 Football. Rickie is likely further along and has a better grasp on our playbook than Luke does. That doesn't mean I love what I see from Rickie... but the back up QB is at their most popular when the starter underperforms

How many of us called for Rickie when Angeli struggled against UConn? Would you make those same comments with hindsight?

I think Luke has the tools to be a great QB.. but that doesn't mean he's our best option right now

Establish the run, design quick and winnable throws, don't turn the ball over, and prevent redzone trips. There's a lot we can improve on no matter who the QB is, that will make their life easier

I say all this as someone who wanted to see Luke during the Duke and SMU games.

Sadly, I would sign on the dotted line for UConn Angeli pre JRS TD the rest of this year. He was 24-43 275 0 TD 1 INT at that point. That is still better than what we have seen from Rickie this year.

 

[baggerbob]

Sadly, I would sign on the dotted line for UConn Angeli pre JRS TD the rest of this year. He was 24-43 275 0 TD 1 INT at that point. That is still better than what we have seen from Rickie this year.

With Rickie starting the rest of the year the possibility of finishing the season with an 8 game losing streak is very real.

 

[JRHEETER]

If we are going to stay with Rickie, I want us to adjust our gameplan to his strengths.

I have yet to see this in two games and that is what makes me concerned.

 

[Jake]

I think people take fran's 'loyalty' remarks as he's a little too locked in on Rickie, or was locked in on Steve

Fran is loyal, but he's also no dummy. He wants to win football games. If Luke Carney gives him a better chance to win than Rickie, he's going to play Luke.

The fact that we haven't seen Luke should tell you he's not ready. Yeah he has a great HS track record, but this is D1 Football. Rickie is likely further along and has a better grasp on our playbook than Luke does. That doesn't mean I love what I see from Rickie... but the back up QB is at their most popular when the starter underperforms

How many of us called for Rickie when Angeli struggled against UConn? Would you make those same comments with hindsight?

I think Luke has the tools to be a great QB.. but that doesn't mean he's our best option right now

Establish the run, design quick and winnable throws, don't turn the ball over, and prevent redzone trips. There's a lot we can improve on no matter who the QB is, that will make their life easier

I say all this as someone who wanted to see Luke during the Duke and SMU games.

I hope you’re right. And let me preface what I’m about to say with the fact that I also think that Fran has winning as his number one goal, and not “being right“

But I do think there are a couple of factors here that are in play. There’s a new term in this NIL world “money don’t sit“. I do wonder how much this is factored into what’s going on.

Moving on from Ricky also means that they spent money on a guy And he clearly isn’t performing. You essentially have to admit that you whiffed.

Football coaches are funny in the sense that they always think they can coach somebody up and tend to not make changes quickly.

Coaches can treat the next two weeks in two different ways. The first is to say we have two weeks to open up the competition and see who’s best, or the second could be- we have two weeks to force-feed Ricky everything that we can and get him coached up in that same time.

We’ll see how this plays out

 

[UnknownOrange]

yeah I think thats it... angeli injury really derailed things... but we need all facets to step up. game plans, playbook, guys making plays, etc

dont throw the season away - fight to get to 6

 

[UnknownOrange]

I hope you’re right. And let me preface what I’m about to say with the fact that I also think that Fran has winning as his number one goal, and not “being right“

But I do think there are a couple of factors here that are in play. There’s a new term in this NIL world “money don’t sit“. I do wonder how much this is factored into what’s going on.

Moving on from Ricky essentially also means that they spent money on a guy And he clearly isn’t performing. You essentially have to admit that you whiffed.

Football coaches are funny in the sense that they always think they can coach somebody up and tend to not make changes quickly.

Coaches can treat the next two weeks and two different ways. The first is to say we have two weeks to open up the competition and see who’s best, or the second could be. I have two weeks to force-feed Ricky everything that we can and get him coached up in that same time.

We’ll see how this plays out

All great points too

Hope he can turn it around and win some games - this team is too talented to miss a bowl game

 

[HRE Otto IV]

If we are going to stay with Rickie, I want us to adjust our gameplan to his strengths.

I have yet to see this in two games and that is what makes me concerned.

You have yet to see any strengths or a tailored gameplan?