No, but it's frustrating because to me the writing has been on the wall about exactly how this will work, and how top programs should adapt. But I have a very analytical mind and this is right at the intersection of a few of my interests and areas of expertise, so it's just annoying to feel like I know the right strategy and then watch us struggle.
In this situation it's really important to manage expectations at each point in time. Like if I were Red I would have made it clear to Maliq that I didn't think him playing 30 minutes per game was in his best interest, and it was greatly appreciated that he was sacrificing for the team both in playing the 5 and playing more minutes than ideal, and that we'd make sure to get him a better mixture of position/minutes next year.
I'd also be trying to cap most of my starters in the 27-30 minute range, which lets you play 6 or 7 guys "starter minutes." You can then get a little gimmicky and have a "Starting Stretch 4" and a "Starting PF" and try to get those guys bought in to starting when the matchup favors them.
Basically the goal is to have ~7 players above a certain skill level, and then 2-3 more who can play, so you have to kind of work backwards from there and figure out the best way to get buy-in from the players.