we play pitt.
Does 19-13 keep us in?
This is a play in game.
we play pitt.
Does 19-13 keep us in?
Don't jinx it! Hold on Hawkeyes!...after Michigan loses tonight.
Obviously the actual resumes are used to select the final teams. You seem comfortable with a 25% chance of getting in. I'm not.I am not denying your 25% figure for a team in the 61-70 range.
But right now there are 4 Power5 teams that are in the 61-70 range after Michigan loses tonight. And there will be one team that is in the tournament -- 25%. (it might be 2)
Syracuse
Michigan
Georgia Tech
Florida St
Not every team above has the same probability to get in. While the RPI is in the same range some clearly have better resumes than the other.
If only 1 can get picked (25% of teams) the great majority will pick Syracuse, some will take Michigan, and none will take the other two.
I don't know how I can make it any simpler for you. It's the resume that matters.
depends what other bubble teams do
Triple like! Then assume that you feel "comfortable", which has never been stated, much less implied...Good to see Chris is backing me up on this.
Too many other people just make general comments without looking at what is happening around us.
without doing a complete evaluation of all teams but mostly the bubble teams to me id say a win over pitt and we should be safely in
Are you really pinning our chances on getting into the tourney on wins vs St Bonny and Texas A&M in November?I am not aware that I said anything close to that.
I was trying to make the case that our resume matters, not our individual RPI. What matters is resume. Here is what matters:
1) Beat Pitt and we are in
2) Lose to Pitt, hope the teams outside of the bubble continue to implode and then compare resumes of teams on the bubble line.
I have no clue what the % of teams in the 60s will ultimately be in, nor does it have any relevance. You are infatuated on the RPI as a means of assessing our chances which is just ... not good.
Are you really pinning our chances on getting into the tourney on wins vs St Bonny and Texas A&M in November?
We're basically a .500 team since then.
Are you really pinning our chances on getting into the tourney on wins vs St Bonny and Texas A&M in November?
We're basically a .500 team since then.
as are most bubble teams...Are you really pinning our chances on getting into the tourney on wins vs St Bonny and Texas A&M in November?
We're basically a .500 team since then.
Exactly. At some point you have to actually win games vs good teams.Since beating Notre Dame back in Jan, what have we done? Beat a winless Bc team, and beat Nc State team at home.
fsuChris, without considering bubble busters, what teams on the outside right now do you think have a decent case on moving up to take a spot from someobdy? I view that group as so weak.
Nobody is making that assumption that we are comfortably in with a loss. That I am aware of anyway. We have a chance, but a slight one.
But many people last week on this board did scoff at the idea that was presented that only 1 win (FSU or game 1 of the ACC) would likely be enough. And that is indeed proving to be the case. But we have to win, which is problematic.
Yes, and FSU and VaTech actually did that today. We continue to suck at playing the game of basketball when it matters the most.And the same is true about the other borderline teams.
Yes, but they are not even borderline...yet. Lots more work to get near the cut line. Not saying it couldn't happen, but compare us to the teams near usYes, and FSU and VaTech actually did that today. We continue to suck at playing the game of basketball when it matters the most.
it's no use bees...opinion and frustration trumps fact yet againAnd the same is true about the other borderline teams.
What if Fla.St. beats BC & Va. Tech before they lose to Virginia? Seems plausible. Does that get them close to the above line?
fsu
georgia tech
someone out of the aac mess
ohio state
florida