I think a legitimate question is what exactly does Red look for in a player?
If it was me, it would be a mixture of talent, will to succeed, willingness to learn, work ethic, toughness and tough defensive attitude.
I think it would be fair to say that Red looks for the talent, and really nothing else.
He does not care about work ethic, toughness, burning will to win or what Fran would call DART.
And his evaluation of talent itself leaves a lot to be desired.
The intangibles don't seem to matter to him and are not rewarded in any way on the court. (See Cuffe the human yo-yo.)
Developing players doesn't seem to matter to him (Moore who is another yo-yo who gets yanked around no matter how well he does, a freshman who is not given any chance to really develop and play)
Why he gives so much time to Bell who is nothing but a shooting prima dona I will never understand.
Even when he scores, he gives up as many points with his poor defense.
And his pouting attitude - if there is no crying in baseball then there should be no pouting in basketball.
We all know this is a lost year now for all intents and purposes so why not give the guys you hope are coming back a little more playing time.
I am an unapologetic Gerry fan who has watched him build a Siena team that reflects his mindset - never give up, work your ass off, harrass the opposing team on defense.
They are low on talent but still battling in the conference because of good coaching and those intangibles.
It is not lost on me that my favorite player last year (Maliq) had Gerry as his primary recruiter.
And my favorite player this year (not at SU) is Gavin Doty from Fulton who was recruited by Gerry at Siena.
Watch this kid - what a huge muff by Red, we even had an extra scholarship that we didnt use.
I am sick of watching this team run by Red.
I am sick of feeling a sense of hopelessness.
I want a coach who first can actually coach in the game and a coach who values in a player what I think is very important. Raw talent is important, but you need the whole package.
I think much of this is an oversimplification.
I hate that i'm defending Red, but...
Some of the players we have on the roster were acquired because of 'easy opportunities.' Some were from limited resources. Some were from limited effort to scour the country for better options. All of this seems to stem from the laziness of the end of the JB era, where we basically seemed to just get guys who were already known to us. Either because of some relationship or because of geography.
So, with Lampkin, i thought the supposition that was common here, that we were inspired by the big NC State center last year, was logical. We went out to find someone who could have that kind of effect/impact. Which turns out to maybe have been a lightning in a bottle example, and not a template.
Carlos was acquired to be a backup PG. And if we had landed a viable target starter, Carlos would probably have thrived, and wouldn't be seen as an (e-)scape goat. Not getting Leffew is more the problem than getting Carlos.
Bell... is emblematic of what i used to say about Buddy. When Buddy struggled and fans screamed about nepotism being the only reason why he was still getting so many minutes, i rationalized it as JB thinking that it was more likely that Buddy would hit 4 out of the next five, even if he had just missed five in a row. That was sometimes proven out, and sometimes not. With Bell, he's shown the ability to hit a lot of shots. So, 'riding' him is an opportunity to both let him work his way back to the mean, and a means of rebuilding confidence. I know nothing about any deals or arrangements or promises that might have been made to Bell or his family, so i'm not going there. But, again, you have a player who can shoot and is lacking in defense. That was Buddy, as well. Red may just be conditioned to acceptance of that kind of player.
The suggestion that we have players who don't want to play hard, or who don't have work ethic or toughness... I don't know. I'm not in practices. I don't see that. I do see players who are, at times, not going hard after loose balls (Bell is a major culprit), and guys who don't play with the kind of toughness we want (McLeod appears 'soft' quite often). I think we have too much of the 'nice guy' syndrome. McLeod's a gentle giant, not a killer. That's personality. I don't know that i could say that 'Red doesn't care' about such things. When scouting transfers or recruits, i think it's a practical matter than you can only be in touch with a certain number of kids. And assessing personality and 'intangibles' is a difficult matter. You see stats, limited video from high schools, and you see in person the performances that may be different because a coach is in the stands.
Yeah, the persistency of this kind of issue makes it seem like it's a consistent fault of the staff. But, again, i think we operate from small pools, don't always get prime targets, and then when they reach campus, we don't have the coaching or systems that instill the necessary drive. A combination of a lot of factors, not just Red being 'stupid or blind' [not your words].
Gerry seems to be doing things the right way. Brought in a big man with big man experience. Changed the culture and image of his team. Those things count. But, he's working on a different plane, and who knows if what he's doing would have translated to more success with our current roster. I don't think it could have been worse... but JB anointed Red as the Assistant Head Coach, and that sealed the line of succession.
We need new coaches. We need bigger NIL.