- Joined
- Aug 16, 2011
- Messages
- 98,125
- Like
- 195,072
I agree. I think Grant can shoot the 3 ball if he puts the time in. Its not like we have Steve Kerr on our roster right now.
noDon't you think working on a specific skill with the opportunity to then implement immediately in game situations may be better than working on the skill and hoping you'll have that opportunity next year?
Sorry you're right. hopefully grant already considers himself rich so it works the other wayWhen did this thread become about Ennis? I think the GM and all of us were discussing Grant. Is projection of going 20-25 doesn't guarantee his to be a millionaire because a projection of there can easily turn into the second round with no guaranteed contract.
Don't you think working on a specific skill with the opportunity to then implement immediately in game situations may be better than working on the skill and hoping you'll have that opportunity next year?
Do the D-league coaches not want to win? Are they not trying to advance their career? I think there's probably a strong argument that the d-league coaches are in a less stable position than a HOF college coach and care even less about a specific player's development. I'd like to see a list of all of these players that develop so well in the d-league and transition to a successful NBA career.There is a very strong argument that he can work on that skill more in the D-League with 6 figures in his pocket then having the ability to work on it in college basketball, where results matter and coaches want win.
Do the D-league coaches not want to win? Are they not trying to advance their career? I think there's probably a strong argument that the d-league coaches are in a less stable position than a HOF college coach and care even less about a specific player's development. I'd like to see a list of all of these players that develop so well in the d-league and transition to a successful NBA career.
...Not to mention, back problems are something highly frowned upon by GM's, so if he has a recurrence, he probably gets marked off draft boards from a medical perspective.
Hope Grant comes back b/c we do need him next year.
On the other hand, perhaps his back problem is hurting teams' opinions of him right now and a full healthy year would give him a boost.
Different era, but it worked for Derrick Coleman.
just like you don't automatically get better staying in schoolTotally agree. But my point is that you don't automatically get better by leaving school. Game experience is critical to a player's development.
Right now, from the info out there, he's projected 20-25. We've seen how easily someone can slip 10 spots or more in the draft (didn't some projections have Donte going in the lottery?), so his projection is hardly guaranteed money. Given his family, he should get better advice than anyone else and, at the same time, is in no need of a pay day.No, D-League coaches are tasked with player development. Similar to baseball. If they develop players, they will get a chance to move to the end of the bench.
If you are in the D-League to begin with, you have a tool that is not ready. So, you will not be a star. However, I will bet there are more people with D-League experience on a NBA bench then you think there are.
I think too many Cuse fans just assume Grant is going to learn a jump shot for next year. I mean, everyone said C.J. should come back so he could improve from 3 and use his right hand. He regressed from 3 and still didn't learn to use right hand.
The difference for C.J. and Jerami is that C.J. wasn't passing on guaranteed money, as he was a first round tweener. Jerami, from everything I have seen, is a 1st rounder and has guaranteed money. Not to mention, back problems are something highly frowned upon by GM's, so if he has a recurrence, he probably gets marked off draft boards from a medical perspective.
Hope Grant comes back b/c we do need him next year.
Right now, from the info out there, he's projected 20-25. We've seen how easily someone can slip 10 spots or more in the draft (didn't some projections have Donte going in the lottery?), so his projection is hardly guaranteed money. Given his family, he should get better advice than anyone else and, at the same time, is in no need of a pay day.
I still don't see how a D-League coach has any more incentive than a college coach to develop players. If a coach wants to win, as was suggested earlier, doesn't he want his best returning players to improve? If they don't, he won't win. That is indeed incentive. If Grant was a projected lottery pick, I'd agree with you, but he's not. Not every kid that pop's onto someone's draft board should jump at it.
I quoted the same part in the other Grant thread. It's the same argument I've made a number of times.
Has CJ Fair improved his draft stock by staying in school?
There are no guarantees about whether staying will help one or not. None. Period. None. Plenty of examples of guys who've lost money by staying.
.
Has CJ Fair improved his draft stock by staying in school?
There are no guarantees about whether staying will help one or not. None. Period. None. Plenty of examples of guys who've lost money by staying.
Is it possible it could help and/or lengthen Grant's NBA career? It's possible. That's all I got out of what that GM assistant said, it's possible it could help him. It's also possible it could hurt him. Course, they didn't ask the GM that question.
So what in all of this is guaranteed? The money one can get from the NBA right now is, in fact, guaranteed, if one knows they will be a 1st round pick. Hmmm.
BTW, I want Grant to stay as well, but I never blame a kid for taking the money while it's being offered. Sometimes the faucet gets turned off and there's no turning it back on.
The problem is I think there's just as good a chance that he falls out of the first round by returning as there is that he catapults himself into the lottery.
If he doesn't make a gigantic leap, he might be looked at the same way McAdoo was, where his stock just continued to plummet with each passing year because his improvements were big enough to satisfy NBA scouts.
I would agree with the athleticism comment if he also had can't miss size for his position, but he doesn't. MCW had his athleticism matched with uncommon size for a PG. Grant is a very athletic and grossly undersized power forward or he is an athletic, but not nearly as remarkably so, small forward that is lacking much more than shooting for that position. At this point, he's lacking, or at the very least hasn't yet demonstrated, all of the perimeter skills needed to be a 3 in the NBA. He has shown no ability to handle the ball, he hasn't shown passing ability, and, as we've both mentioned, he hasn't shown the ability to shoot. If he was lacking only one of those, he'd certainly be in better shape, but he's lacking all three.The 2 biggest questions for Grant are jump shot and back. The positives he has going for him is he (like MCW) will test extremely well athletically and he is young enough that a team will take him top 20 in the hopes he can develop a jumper. I really don't think he has to worry about falling out of the first round, but things can happen.
Well, a college coach's job is to win while a D-League coach's job is to develop. A college coach can win and not develop players for the next level (does a 2-3 zone prepare players for the next level?), while if a D-League coach doesn't develop his first rounders, he will be looking for a new organization (him or the scouting director, cough cough Hasheem Thabeet cough cough).
I think Grant is a prime example of this from this year. I think nearly everyone here thinks that he was given the red light on shooting threes b/c his drive game is much better. In the D-League, he will be encouraged to shoot the 3 ball.
Not saying that D-League or Syracuse would be better for him to develop, but the D-League does a better job developing then people think.
Valid argument. Except that that happened to McAdoo because he was maxed out [basically] in terms of his skill development, versus Grant who has a LONG way to go to improve, both skill-wise and in terms of his physique.
if all you are going to do is sit at the end of the bench then, no, you are not going to get better. but if that is the state of your internal motivation, then you aren't really going to get better in college, either, even if you put up some decent numbers.
anyone with the skill and motivation is better off going pro ASAP. anyone who doesn't is going to wash out either way.
That's cool. I wasn't calling you out. Just pointing out that someone else shares opinion in another thread.Sorry, missed your post.
Got this quote from the article today in the Post about Jerami's draft prospects. This is the essence of the argument I have made regarding certain players who may not be ready for the demands and physicality of the NBA:'
The Western Conference assistant GM laid out two scenarios for Grant.
"If he comes out and he goes, let's say 25th, he's on a good team,'' the NBA exec said. "He's making good money, but he's just under a million dollars a year. It's good money, but he's on a good team and he's not getting that much playing time. It's hard to develop when you're not playing.
"Or he stays in school and works on his skills,'' he added. "He has a much larger role on offense. He adds some weight. Now he goes 13th and he's making a whole lot more money. He's on a lottery team but hopefully an up-and-coming team. He's more prepared for playing time and you'd guess he's on a team that can give him playing time.''
You don't automatically get better by sitting at the end of an NBA bench. NBA players don't practice as much as you may think. A lot of what they do between games is cardio conditioning for guys who don't get enough game time.
But don't kid yourself, you NEED game time to get better as a player.
i say it too much you can explain a lot with kahneman's thinking fast and slow
if you have a question that's too hard to answer, people substitute questions they can answer and instead of calculating probabilites and expected values, they use simpler buckets for impossible, possible, certain. people will pay a premium to go from one bucket to another
how do i maximize my earnings is a tough question. don't know if you'll get hurt, don't know how you'll develop, don't know if you'll hurt your draft stock.
so substitute a different question. will i be a millionaire if i go pro? you can have certainty of that assuming nba teams are honest
so maybe tyler ennis is giving up some expected value (paying a premium essentially) for the certainty of knowing he's going to be a millionaire
There is a very strong argument that he can work on that skill more in the D-League with 6 figures in his pocket then having the ability to work on it in college basketball, where results matter and coaches want win.
The difference for C.J. and Jerami is that C.J. wasn't passing on guaranteed money, as he was a first round tweener. Jerami, from everything I have seen, is a 1st rounder and has guaranteed money. Not to mention, back problems are something highly frowned upon by GM's, so if he has a recurrence, he probably gets marked off draft boards from a medical perspective.
Hope Grant comes back b/c we do need him next year.