I have a feeling this is factually incorrect and is highly dependent on how you spin the numbers. Don’t state universities subsidize their athletic departments.
Yeah, but usually through student fees. It's not coming out of the state budget.
I have a feeling this is factually incorrect and is highly dependent on how you spin the numbers. Don’t state universities subsidize their athletic departments.
Yeah, but usually through student fees. It's not coming out of the state budget.
Para 1 - The argument is really over having state tax money going toward athletics. I can tell you in VA the only tax money that went to support athletics that I have been able to determine was that the state built VMI's indoor practice facility because it was declared the "Corps Physical Training Facility". (My in-laws live in Lexington and couldn't understand why it was so big. They were flabbergasted when I explained to them what it really was.) Student activity fees are collected in addition to tuition. It is not "one pot", and I imagine that's because there are 1 District and 50 state laws that mandate that it not be "one pot". A large portion of it at UVa goes toward the athletic department. In "exchange" for that, all students are admitted free to all home regular season games in all sports. (For basketball crowd control, they have to have a ticket as well as their ID card, but the ticket is free despite the "hoops" they have to jump through to get them; I think there's some sort of lottery now.) Supposedly, the amount from student fees at UVa is one of the largest in college sports. That fee covers other things as well, like club sports and other interest clubs, like it does at any other school that has one.I am not expert but isnt that a way of just earmarking money? For example, if the state gives a university some funding and then the school also takes money from tuition, isnt that all revenue in a sense. Is there an argument that these “student fees” could be used to lessen the amount of state funding needed. At the end of the day, its one pot.
A majority of schools AD do not turn a profit. That includes many public schools. I know accounting tricks are in play but the AD are somehow operating in perpetuity while incurring annual losses (allegedly) but without raising capital either, as a private company would. So how does that work?
Exactly. These programs are not paying players from their own coffers! The money is coming from shoe companies, agents and boosters. I really have to question the smarts of the people suggesting otherwise.This not a defense of Sean Miller, but the answer to this question for Miller and every other coach at a state school is $0.00 State money does not fund athletics. There are laws against that. Using state money is a very quick way for the athletic department people and the academics to end up in jail. And for Miller, there would be less than zero sympathy from the Arizona State and Northern Arizona alums in their government.
Lemme guess, no additional penalties since Sean Miller and Book Richardson were already fired. Wheelhouse!
So I'm assuming Syracuse took a 1 year self imposed post season ban. How many scholarships did we lose and how many wins did Boeheim have to give up this time?
GIVE JB HIS WINS BACK FOR ALL THAT IS HOLY.
This is all a joke.
Give the man his wins back and eek out some semblance of doing the right thing.