Agree completely with this and posted something similar on Nunes the other day. There is no way all of that law enforcement and investigation comes up empty. Unless of course Bernie is innocent.
This is why I lean towards something other than what he was accused of. Pedophiles rarely if ever have just ONE victim. To have no one but a relative of the accuser belatedly come forward is waaay too convenient, IMO.
Also, the tape sounded far worse than it really was, IMO- its the timing and ESPN's editing more than the content, that made him look guilty. And so what if Laurie stayed silent when he said "Bernie's a pedophile"? I've called people worse in a conversation, and if it was taped I'd look pretty bad. The "did you blow him" question could also be taken out of context since she doesn't add "when u were underage".
Finally the clincher for me was, why didn't Davis just say it straight out: "When I was 11 years old Bernie molested me and he's kept it up to this day". Why is he so vague if what he was looking for was corroboration? He NEVER makes that direct statement, NOT ONCE, on any of the tapes. Why not?
When Tomaselli came forward and ESPN embraced his accusations for sensationalist reasons, and Schwarz forgot the use of "allegedly" in his vocabulary, suddenly Bernie was guilty before proven innocent. Couple that with the publicity-seeking DA announcing that he "would have indicted him if he could", and the rest is history.
Once the layers were pulled back and some of the nonsense exposed, it was too late to change that first impression.
What that man went through, & continues to go through, is something I wouldn't wish on my worst enemy. JMHO