Melancer46
Living Legend
- Joined
- Dec 1, 2011
- Messages
- 10,503
- Like
- 13,780
I don’t get this Canada thing they’re trying make happen.
My friends at Syracuse to this day refer to me as Canadian because I'm from Rochester lol
I don’t get this Canada thing they’re trying make happen.
I am not too worried. Hurley and co. have all their eggs in one basket here. They are offering more PT at the position than Cuse and are not really focusing on any other forwards outside of Precious who might be a spring signee where ever he goes. Akok visiting because he said he would, plain and simple.
The way they talk about Syracuse as a city is hilarious.
And not everyone is afraid of a little snow.
I checked the weather first thing there when I woke up this morning. It was 29 Degrees with a high of 52.
Today in Syracuse it was 40 with a high of 65.
They're idiots.
They did win a title in 2014. Just saying.Yes they are. They are also like the Charlie Brown of college sports -- nothing they ever do turns out right.
First they get left out of major conference realignment.
Then, they delusionally convince themselves that it will all be all right because major conferences want them -- the B1G... NO, the Big 12 -- only to find themselves on the outside looking in as their football / hoops programs go down the tubes.
They hire an alum who is going to carry on the success that Calhoun had -- only to self-incriminate on NCAA penalties to get out of having to pay him severance.
Akok Akok was ostensibly going to announce his commitment not once, but twice this week... their insiders insist it! Oops...
And now they're comically / pathetically resorting to hoping that the weather is poor in CNY for Akok's visit, because - well, that's really the only hope that they have at this point - only to have it be an unseasonably warm 65 degrees in Syracuse.
Literally, nothing has gone right for them since they got left out of big boy college athletics.
It is so much fun watching them suck! I am happy that they got left out, and will never be anything more than a mid-major moving forward.
They did win a title in 2014. Just saying.
They did win a title in 2014. Just saying.
The University of San Francisco has 2 titles. Things change. Schools are left in the dust..
And the longer they make zero noise the further away those titles become. For a team with four titles in a short time span for college hoops they are talked about far less than a team with one title and two final fours since 2003. It burns them to the core so they come out with their own hunger games salute to us to whose really boss...
View attachment 142281
I don’t get this Canada thing they’re trying make happen.
Can we get him a cake just in case?Hey listen, it’s all they have left.
They have to sell a recruit’s parents on the idea that they’re sending their son to a school where the women’s team outdraws the men’s and for their reward they get guaranteed road trips to Tulsa, Wichita St and SMU.
And they bend over backward to avoid having basketball recruits on campus during home football weekends because the product and atmosphere is embarrassing. Siting outside with 9,500 other people bitching about getting beat by a number higher than the temperature is not a fun time.
We’re taking the kid to a homecoming game...where hopefully we win in a comfortable dome that he’s going to play hoops in the following year.
It’s a night and day pitch. Love that the visits are so close together.
That is such a stupid argument. They have won 3 titles since we last won, including 2 this decade. San Francisco won titles in the 50s. Yeah they are a mess right now, although they hired the hottest coaching candidate last year, who chose them over an ACC school. Let's see where they are in 5 years before we dig their grave. We haven't exactly been the model of consistency lately.The University of San Francisco has 2 titles. Things change. Schools are left in the dust..
I'm pretty sure you're on the wrong board.That is such a stupid argument. They have won 3 titles since we last won, including 2 this decade. San Francisco won titles in the 50s. Yeah they are a mess right now, although they hired the hottest coaching candidate last year, who chose them over an ACC school. Let's see where they are in 5 years before we dig their grave. We haven't exactly been the model of consistency lately.
We end up looking dumb to other fan bases (most of all to them) when we say things like "I don't care about national titles, we get 20+ fans during the week." Bottom line is they have won 4. We have 1. Huge difference. I am sorry. I know we have been better for longer, but at the end of the day I look at championships. That is how programs are judged.
We have the massive advantage of the ACC versus the American. No doubt there. But I am the only one worried about our future? Our head coach is 73. What if our next hire turns out to be bad? Being in the ACC doesn't guarantee that your program sustains success (look at Pitt).
I'm trying to be objective. Shame on me.I'm pretty sure you're on the wrong board.
K. Tell me about our weather?I'm trying to be objective. Shame on me.
That is such a stupid argument. They have won 3 titles since we last won, including 2 this decade. San Francisco won titles in the 50s. Yeah they are a mess right now, although they hired the hottest coaching candidate last year, who chose them over an ACC school. Let's see where they are in 5 years before we dig their grave. We haven't exactly been the model of consistency lately.
We end up looking dumb to other fan bases (most of all to them) when we say things like "I don't care about national titles, we get 20+ fans during the week." Bottom line is they have won 4. We have 1. Huge difference. I am sorry. I know we have been better for longer, but at the end of the day I look at championships. That is how programs are judged.
We have the massive advantage of the ACC versus the American. No doubt there. But I am the only one worried about our future? Our head coach is 73. What if our next hire turns out to be bad? Being in the ACC doesn't guarantee that your program sustains success (look at Pitt).
The conference is a major issue. And Hurley will make or break their program going forward. I think he was a good hire.They play sht teams day in and day out , are coming off consecutive losing records and three head coaches in six years.
I’m comfortable with 4>1. If they want to wave it around then fine. Because their program is depressing as sht otherwise.
They had a really good 20 year stretch. They are not a great program. They caught lightning in a bottle for a little while and have since faded back into the afterthoughts they were previous to the early 90s. Unless they get into a power conf, it's unlikely they'll ever have any measure of sustained success again.That is such a stupid argument. They have won 3 titles since we last won, including 2 this decade. San Francisco won titles in the 50s. Yeah they are a mess right now, although they hired the hottest coaching candidate last year, who chose them over an ACC school. Let's see where they are in 5 years before we dig their grave. We haven't exactly been the model of consistency lately.
We end up looking dumb to other fan bases (most of all to them) when we say things like "I don't care about national titles, we get 20+ fans during the week." Bottom line is they have won 4. We have 1. Huge difference. I am sorry. I know we have been better for longer, but at the end of the day I look at championships. That is how programs are judged.
We have the massive advantage of the ACC versus the American. No doubt there. But I am the only one worried about our future? Our head coach is 73. What if our next hire turns out to be bad? Being in the ACC doesn't guarantee that your program sustains success (look at Pitt).
He will leave UConn as soon as he can.The conference is a major issue. And Hurley will make or break their program going forward. I think he was a good hire.
I just hope we make one when the times comes. I'm nervous about it. Hard to replace a HOF coach. Look at yukon.
So "lighting in a bottle" is a 20 year stretch? This is what I mean. If they aren't a great program (they have 4 tiltes) than what are we? I know we have been better for LONGER than them but still. We demean ourselves when we talk like that.They had a really good 20 year stretch. They are not a great program. They caught lightning in a bottle for a little while and have since faded back into the afterthoughts they were previous to the early 90s. Unless they get into a power conf, it's unlikely they'll ever have any measure of sustained success again.
The conference is a major issue. And Hurley will make or break their program going forward. I think he was a good hire.
I just hope we make one when the times comes. I'm nervous about it. Hard to replace a HOF coach. Look at yukon.